Evaluation of injection force of three insulin delivery pens

被引:16
作者
Asakura, T. [1 ]
Seino, H. [2 ]
Kageyama, M. [1 ]
Yohkoh, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ Pharm & Appl Life Sci, Dept Clin Pharm, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Akiha Ku, Niigata 9568603, Japan
[2] Seino Clin, Koriyama, Fukushima 9638851, Japan
关键词
injection force; insulin pen; KwikPen; Next Generation FlexPen; SoloStar; DIABETES-MELLITUS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; PREFERENCE; ACCURACY; SAFETY; SYRINGES; EFFICACY; THERAPY; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1517/14656560903018929
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: Reduced injection force is among the modifications to the Next Generation FlexPen (R) (NGFP). This force was compared with two other prefilled pens: SoloStar (R) (SS) and KwikPen (R) (KP). Research design/methods: The injection force of the pens was measured, with either a BD Micro-Fine (TM) 31G thin-wall needle, or a NovoFine (R) 32G Tip extra thin wall needle attached. Pens of each type were tested with both needles, during injection of 20 U insulin, at speeds 3.3, 5 and 8.3 mm/s. Results: NGFP had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean injection force than SS or KP, at all injection speeds, with both needles. Injection forces (mean +/- s.d.) with NGFP and the BD Micro-Fine (TM) 31G thin-wall needle were: 8.1 +/- 0.7, 10.7 +/- 1.4 and 15.6 +/- 0.9 N at the three speeds, respectively. For SS, the corresponding values were: 9.2 +/- 0.5, 13.3 +/- 0.8 and 20.7 +/- 2.4 N. For KP they were: 12.5 +/- 1.6, 16.9 +/- 1.2 and 24.5 +/- 2.6 N. Attached to the NovoFine (R) 32G Tip extra thin wall needle, the NGFP injection forces were: 5.7 +/- 0.4, 8.2 +/- 0.7 and 12.7 +/- 0.5 N; with SS were: 6.7 +/- 0.3, 10.4 +/- 2.1 and 16.3 +/- 1.1 N; and with KP were: 9.1 +/- 1.3, 13.1 +/- 0.8 and 21.6 +/- 2.0 N. The injection force with NGFP was 12 - 25% lower compared with SS and 35 - 41% lower compared with KP. Conclusions: This study shows that NGFP has a significantly lower injection force than SS or KP.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1393
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Albano Stefano, 2004, Acta Biomed, V75, P34
  • [2] Asakura T, 2005, DIABETES, V54, pA498
  • [3] ASAKURA T, 2005, J CLIN RES, V8, P33
  • [4] Dosing accuracy of two insulin pre-filled pens
    Asakura, Toshinari
    Seino, Hiroaki
    Kageyama, Miho
    Yohkoh, Noriaki
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (05) : 1429 - 1434
  • [5] SAFETY, EFFICACY, ACCEPTABILITY OF A PRE-FILLED INSULIN PEN IN DIABETIC-PATIENTS OVER 60 YEARS OLD
    COSCELLI, C
    LOSTIA, S
    LUNETTA, M
    NOSARI, I
    CORONEL, GA
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1995, 28 (03) : 173 - 177
  • [6] The influence of insulin use on glycemic control - How well do adults follow prescriptions for insulin?
    Cramer, JA
    Pugh, MJ
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (01) : 78 - 83
  • [7] Adherence to insulin and its association with glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes
    Donnelly, L. A.
    Morris, A. D.
    Evans, J. M. M.
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 100 (06) : 345 - 350
  • [8] Frey MI, 1996, J RHEUMATOL, V23, P716
  • [9] Assessment by patients with diabetes mellitus of two insulin pen delivery systems versus a vial and syringe
    Graff, MR
    McClanahan, MA
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 20 (03) : 486 - 496
  • [10] Hanel Heike, 2008, J Diabetes Sci Technol, V2, P478