The CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR-positive advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Ding, Wu [1 ]
Li, Zhian [1 ]
Wang, Caiyun [2 ]
Ruan, GuoDong [1 ]
Chen, LuPing [4 ]
Tu, Chuanjian [3 ]
机构
[1] Shaoxing Second Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoxing Second Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[3] Shaoxing Keqiao Women & Childrens Hosp, Dept Surg, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
advanced breast cancer; CDK4; 6; inhibitor; HR-positive; meta-analysis; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PALBOCICLIB; FULVESTRANT; THERAPY; LETROZOLE; COMBINATION; RESISTANCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010746
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Recently, several high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have identified that cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4/6 inhibitors obtained a great safety and efficacy, which can be consequently applied as a combination therapy with letrozole or fulvestrant for women who had advanced breast cancer and progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. In this systemic review, we performed a meta-analysis to explore whether CDK4/6 inhibitors had a significantly benefit to treating hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer.Methods:The data for meta-analysis were collected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1980 to December 2017, and eventually 3182 patients from 6 RCTs were included.Results:The result showed the CDK4/6 inhibitor group had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio=0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.57, P < .00001), a better objective response (risk rate=1.53; 95% CI, 1.35-1.74, P < .00001), as well as a better clinical benefit response (risk rate=1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47, P=.0001). Besides, subgroup analyses of PFS according to stratification factors and other baseline characteristics confirmed a great performance of CDK4/6 inhibitors across the all subgroups. And sensitive analysis showed that all outcomes were stable except Finn 2014 trail.Conclusion:CDK4/6 inhibitors can significantly prolong the PFS and improve the objective response and clinical benefit response among the patients with HR-positive/ HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dai, Qiuying
    Wang, Yongling
    Liao, Mingjuan
    Chen, Hongfeng
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, : 3727 - 3742
  • [22] Efficacy of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ergun, Yakup
    Dogan, Mutlu
    Ucar, Gokhan
    Karacin, Pinar
    Karacin, Cengiz
    EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2023, 24 (17) : 1901 - 1909
  • [23] CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Game Changers in the Management of Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer?
    Shah, Mirat
    Nunes, Maria Raquel
    Stearns, Vered
    ONCOLOGY-NEW YORK, 2018, 32 (05): : 216 - 222
  • [24] Risk of Cardiovascular Events with Cyclin-Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) Inhibitors among Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Yi-Shao
    Dong, Kevin
    Park, Chanhyun
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (11)
  • [25] Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in women with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bolzacchini, Elena
    Pomero, Fulvio
    Fazio, Martina
    Civitelli, Chiara
    Fabro, Giulia
    Pellegrino, Domenico
    Giordano, Monica
    Squizzato, Alessandro
    THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2021, 208 : 190 - 197
  • [26] CDK4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: differences in toxicity profiles and impact on agent choice. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Onesti, Concetta E.
    Jerusalem, Guy
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2021, 21 (03) : 283 - 298
  • [27] CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance: A bibliometric analysis
    Pang, Jiayuecheng
    Li, Hengyu
    Sheng, Yuan
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [28] Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors in HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Zhihao
    Zhao, Xin
    Chen, Jie
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [29] CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer, what is beyond?
    Mohammed, Amrallah A.
    Rashied, Hanaa
    Elsayed, Fifi Mostafa
    ONCOLOGY REVIEWS, 2019, 13 (02) : 125 - 133
  • [30] Hepatic adverse events with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a systematic review combining meta-analysis and FAERS database
    Tang, Yuyao
    Li, Yongxin
    Zhang, Chengrong
    Ye, Yinyin
    Qiu, Tianlei
    Zhu, Zijun
    Zhao, Jiuda
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2025,