The CDK4/6 inhibitor in HR-positive advanced breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Ding, Wu [1 ]
Li, Zhian [1 ]
Wang, Caiyun [2 ]
Ruan, GuoDong [1 ]
Chen, LuPing [4 ]
Tu, Chuanjian [3 ]
机构
[1] Shaoxing Second Hosp, Dept Surg Oncol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoxing Second Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[3] Shaoxing Keqiao Women & Childrens Hosp, Dept Surg, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
advanced breast cancer; CDK4; 6; inhibitor; HR-positive; meta-analysis; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; MOLECULAR PORTRAITS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PALBOCICLIB; FULVESTRANT; THERAPY; LETROZOLE; COMBINATION; RESISTANCE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010746
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:Recently, several high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have identified that cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) 4/6 inhibitors obtained a great safety and efficacy, which can be consequently applied as a combination therapy with letrozole or fulvestrant for women who had advanced breast cancer and progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. In this systemic review, we performed a meta-analysis to explore whether CDK4/6 inhibitors had a significantly benefit to treating hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer.Methods:The data for meta-analysis were collected from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1980 to December 2017, and eventually 3182 patients from 6 RCTs were included.Results:The result showed the CDK4/6 inhibitor group had a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio=0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.57, P < .00001), a better objective response (risk rate=1.53; 95% CI, 1.35-1.74, P < .00001), as well as a better clinical benefit response (risk rate=1.29; 95% CI, 1.13-1.47, P=.0001). Besides, subgroup analyses of PFS according to stratification factors and other baseline characteristics confirmed a great performance of CDK4/6 inhibitors across the all subgroups. And sensitive analysis showed that all outcomes were stable except Finn 2014 trail.Conclusion:CDK4/6 inhibitors can significantly prolong the PFS and improve the objective response and clinical benefit response among the patients with HR-positive/ HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, N Engl J Med, V379, P2582, DOI 10.1056/NEJMx180043
[3]   Brain metastases free survival differs between breast cancer subtypes [J].
Berghoff, A. ;
Bago-Horvath, Z. ;
De Vries, C. ;
Dubsky, P. ;
Pluschnig, U. ;
Rudas, M. ;
Rottenfusser, A. ;
Knauer, M. ;
Eiter, H. ;
Fitzal, F. ;
Dieckmann, K. ;
Mader, R. M. ;
Gnant, M. ;
Zielinski, C. C. ;
Steger, G. G. ;
Preusser, M. ;
Bartsch, R. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 106 (03) :440-446
[4]   Double-blind, Randomized placebo controlled trial of fulvestrant compared with exemestane after prior nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer: Results from EFECT [J].
Chia, Stephen ;
Gradishar, William ;
Mauriac, Louis ;
Bines, Jose ;
Amant, Frederic ;
Federico, Miriam ;
Fein, Luis ;
Romieu, Gilles ;
Buzdar, Aman ;
Robertson, John F. R. ;
Brufsky, Adam ;
Possinger, Kurt ;
Rennie, Pamela ;
Sapunar, Francisco ;
Lowe, Elizabeth ;
Piccart, Martine .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (10) :1664-1670
[5]   Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial [J].
Cristofanilli, Massimo ;
Turner, Nicholas C. ;
Bondarenko, Igor ;
Ro, Jungsil ;
Im, Seock-Ah ;
Masuda, Norikazu ;
Colleoni, Marco ;
DeMichele, Angela ;
Loi, Sherene ;
Verma, Sunil ;
Iwata, Hiroji ;
Harbeck, Nadia ;
Zhang, Ke ;
Theall, Kathy Puyana ;
Jiang, Yuqiu ;
Bartlett, Cynthia Huang ;
Koehler, Maria ;
Slamon, Dennis .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (04) :425-439
[6]   Ribociclib plus letrozole in early breast cancer: A presurgical, window-of-opportunity study [J].
Curigliano, G. ;
Gomez Pardo, P. ;
Meric-Bernstam, F. ;
Conte, P. ;
Lolkema, M. P. ;
Beck, J. T. ;
Bardia, A. ;
Martinez Garcia, M. ;
Penault-Llorca, F. ;
Dhuria, S. ;
Tang, Z. ;
Solovieff, N. ;
Miller, M. ;
Di Tomaso, E. ;
Hurvitz, S. A. .
BREAST, 2016, 28 :191-198
[7]   Results of the CONFIRM Phase III Trial Comparing Fulvestrant 250 mg With Fulvestrant 500 mg in Postmenopausal Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer [J].
Di Leo, Angelo ;
Jerusalem, Guy ;
Petruzelka, Lubos ;
Torres, Roberto ;
Bondarenko, Igor N. ;
Khasanov, Rustem ;
Verhoeven, Didier ;
Pedrini, Jose L. ;
Smirnova, Iya ;
Lichinitser, Mikhail R. ;
Pendergrass, Kelly ;
Garnett, Sally ;
Lindemann, Justin P. O. ;
Sapunar, Francisco ;
Martin, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (30) :4594-4600
[8]   MONARCH1: Results from a phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as monotherapy, in patients with HR+/HER2-breast cancer, after chemotherapy for advanced disease. [J].
Dickler, Maura N. ;
Tolaney, Sara M. ;
Rugo, Hope S. ;
Cortes, Javier ;
Dieras, Veronique ;
Patt, Debra A. ;
Wildiers, Hans ;
Frenzel, Martin ;
Koustenis, Andrew ;
Baselga, Jose .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15)
[9]   Molecular Pathways: CDK4 Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy [J].
Dickson, Mark A. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 20 (13) :3379-3383
[10]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247