Substitution of PFAS chemistry in outdoor apparel and the impact on repellency performance

被引:46
作者
Hill, Philippa J. [1 ]
Taylor, Mark [1 ]
Goswami, Parikshit [1 ]
Blackburn, Richard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Design, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances; PFOA and PFOS; Consumer products; Outdoor apparel; Sustainability; SEM-; EDX; POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS; ALKYL SUBSTANCES; MADRID STATEMENT; PERFLUOROALKYL; ACIDS; ALTERNATIVES; BINDING; SERUM; PFCAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Intensifying legislation and increased research on the toxicological and persistent nature of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have recently influenced the direction of liquid repellent chemistry use; environmental, social, and sustainability responsibilities are at the crux. Without PFAS chemistry, it is challenging to meet current textile industry liquid repellency requirements, which is a highly desirable property, particularly in outdoor apparel where the technology helps to provide the wearer with essential protection from adverse environmental conditions. Herein, complexities between required functionality, legislation and sustainability within outdoor apparel are discussed, and fundamental technical performance of commercially available long-chain (C8) PFASs, shorter-chain (C6) PFASs, and non-fluorinated repellent chemistries finishes are evaluated comparatively. Non-fluorinated finishes provided no oil repellency, and were clearly inferior in this property to PFAS-finished fabrics that demonstrated good oil-resistance. However, water repellency ratings were similar across the range of all finished fabrics tested, all demonstrating a high level of resistance to wetting, and several non fluorinated repellent fabrics provide similar water repellency to long-chain (C8) PFAS or shorter-chain (C6) PFAS finished fabrics. The primary repellency function required in outdoor apparel is water repellency, and we would propose that the use of PFAS chemistry for such garments is over-engineering, providing oil repellency that is in excess of user requirements. Accordingly, significant environmental and toxicological benefits could be achieved by switching outdoor apparel to non-fluorinated finishes without a significant reduction in garment water-repellency performance. These conclusions are being supported by further research into the effect of laundering, abrasion and ageing of these fabrics. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] AATCC, 2014, 222014 AATCC
  • [2] Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Exposures and Incident Cancers among Adults Living Near a Chemical Plant
    Barry, Vaughn
    Winquist, Andrea
    Steenland, Kyle
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 121 (11-12) : 1313 - 1318
  • [3] Perfluorochemicals: Potential sources of and migration from food packaging
    Begley, TH
    White, K
    Honigfort, P
    Twaroski, ML
    Neches, R
    Walker, RA
    [J]. FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 22 (10): : 1023 - 1031
  • [4] Alternatives to PFASs: Perspectives on the Science
    Birnbaum, Linda S.
    Grandjean, Philippe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 123 (05) : A104 - A105
  • [5] The Madrid Statement on Poly- and Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)
    Blum, Arlene
    Balan, Simona A.
    Scheringer, Martin
    Trier, Xenia
    Goldenman, Gretta
    Cousins, Ian T.
    Diamond, Miriam
    Fletcher, Tony
    Higgins, Christopher
    Lindeman, Avery E.
    Peaslee, Graham
    de Voogt, Pim
    Wang, Zhanyun
    Weber, Roland
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 123 (05) : A107 - A111
  • [6] Booth J. E., 1983, PRINCIPLES TEXTILE T
  • [7] Fluorotechnology Is Critical to Modern Life: The FluoroCouncil Counterpoint to the Madrid Statement
    Bowman, Jessica S.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2015, 123 (05) : A112 - A113
  • [8] BSI (British Standards Institution), 2012, 49202012 BSI EN ISO
  • [9] BSI (British Standards Institution), 2010, 144192010 BSI EN ISO
  • [10] BSI (British Standards Institution), 2009, 232322009 BSI ISO