Contingent Valuation of Woodland-Owner Private Amenities in Spain, Portugal, and California

被引:29
作者
Campos, Pablo [1 ]
Oviedo, Jose L. [1 ]
Caparros, Alejandro [1 ]
Huntsinger, Lynn [2 ]
Coelho, Inocencio [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Spanish Natl Res Council, Inst Publ Goods & Policies, Madrid 28037, Spain
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Natl Inst Biol Resources, P-2005058 Santarem, Portugal
关键词
agroforestry systems; environmental economics; environmental services; Mediterranean woodlands; private ownership; stated preferences; RURAL LAND VALUES; CONSUMPTIVE-USE COMPONENTS; RANCHERS; TEXAS;
D O I
10.2111/08-178R2.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most of the Mediterranean woodlands in Spain, Portugal, and California are managed as agrosilvopastoral enterprises, producing some combination of livestock, wood, cork products, and crops, as well as wildlife habitat and diverse environmental services. Private amenity benefits to landowners have been Suggested as an explanation for high land prices and the persistence of such rangeland enterprises despite apparently marginal cash returns. In this study, private amenity values are estimated using a contingent valuation technique in surveys of private woodland owners as part of five case studies, using a design developed to separate landowner amenity income and capital values. Nonindustrial private landowners were asked about the maximum amount of money that they were willing to give up (to pay) before selling their property to invest in more commercially profitable assets, and the proportion of the market price of their woodland that they think is explained by privately consumed amenities. Amenity values were found to be relevant because, in all cases, landowners were willing to pay > (sic)120 . ha(-1) . yr(-1), at 2002 prices, and attributed > 30% of land market price to amenities. These values represent an amenity profitability rate > 2% in all case studies. The data analysis shows some similarities, but mostly divergences, in the different land-simulated and amenity-simulated markets.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 252
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] American Agricultural Economics Association, 2000, COMM COSTS RET EST H
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, WORLD DEV IND
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, LIMDEP VERSION 9 0
  • [4] [Anonymous], EUR FRAM INT ENV EC
  • [5] MOTIVATION OF COLORADO RANCHERS WITH FEDERAL GRAZING ALLOTMENTS
    BARTLETT, ET
    TAYLOR, RG
    MCKEAN, JR
    HOF, JG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1989, 42 (06): : 454 - 457
  • [6] Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: a hedonic model using geographic information systems data
    Bastian, CT
    McLeod, DM
    Germino, MJ
    Reiners, WA
    Blasko, BJ
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (03) : 337 - 349
  • [7] Estimating four Hicksian welfare measures for a public good: A contingent valuation investigation
    Bateman, IJ
    Langford, IH
    Munro, A
    Starmer, C
    Sugden, R
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2000, 76 (03) : 355 - 373
  • [8] Social and private total Hickslan incomes of multiple use forests in Spain
    Campos, P
    Caparrós, A
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (04) : 545 - 557
  • [9] Campos P., 1996, INFORMACI N COMERCIA, P47
  • [10] ON THE CHOICE OF FUNCTIONAL FORM FOR HEDONIC PRICE FUNCTIONS
    CROPPER, ML
    DECK, LB
    MCCONNELL, KE
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1988, 70 (04) : 668 - 675