Beyond Technical Fixes: climate solutions and the great derangement

被引：271

作者：

Nightingale, Andrea Joslyn ^{[1
,2
]}

Eriksen, Siri ^{[3
]}

Taylor, Marcus ^{[4
]}

Forsyth, Timothy ^{[5
]}

Pelling, Mark ^{[6
]}

Newsham, Andrew ^{[7
]}

Boyd, Emily ^{[8
]}

Brown, Katrina ^{[9
]}

Harvey, Blane ^{[10
,11
]}

Jones, Lindsey ^{[11
]}

Kerr, Rachel Bezner ^{[12
]}

Mehta, Lyla ^{[13
]}

Naess, Lars Otto ^{[13
]}

Ockwell, David ^{[14
]}

Scoones, Ian ^{[13
]}

Tanner, Thomas ^{[15
]}

Whitfield, Stephen ^{[16
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Sociol & Human Geog, Oslo, Norway

[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Urban & Rural Dev, Uppsala, Sweden

[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies, As, Norway

[4] Queens Univ, Dept Global Dev Studies, Kingston, ON, Canada

[5] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Int Dev, London, England

[6] Kings Coll London, Dept Geog, London, England

[7] SOAS Univ London, Dept Dev Studies, London, England

[8] Lund Univ, Ctr Sustainabil Studies, Lund, Sweden

[9] Univ Exeter, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Exeter, Devon, England

[10] McGill Univ, Dept Integrated Studies Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada

[11] Overseas Dev Inst, London, England

[12] Cornell Univ, Dept Dev Sociol, Ithaca, NY USA

[13] Inst Dev Studies, Brighton, E Sussex, England

[14] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Dept Geog, Brighton, E Sussex, England

[15] SOAS Univ London, Ctr Dev & Environm Policy, London, England

[16] Univ Leeds, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England

来源：

CLIMATE AND DEVELOPMENT | 2020年 / 12卷 / 04期

基金：

瑞典研究理事会;

关键词：

climate change; climate science; knowledge; plural ontologies; politics of adaptation; co-production; climate justice; KNOWLEDGE COPRODUCTION; SOCIAL-THEORY; ADAPTATION; RESILIENCE; VULNERABILITY; POLITICS; SCIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; AUTHORITY; JUSTICE;

D O I：

10.1080/17565529.2019.1624495

中图分类号：

F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;

摘要：

Climate change research is at an impasse. The transformation of economies and everyday practices is more urgent, and yet appears ever more daunting as attempts at behaviour change, regulations, and global agreements confront material and social-political infrastructures that support the status quo. Effective action requires new ways of conceptualizing society, climate and environment and yet current research struggles to break free of established categories. In response, this contribution revisits important insights from the social sciences and humanities on the co-production of political economies, cultures, societies and biophysical relations and shows the possibilities for ontological pluralism to open up for new imaginations. Its intention is to help generate a different framing of socionatural change that goes beyond the current science-policy-behavioural change pathway. It puts forward several moments of inadvertent concealment in contemporary debates that stem directly from the way issues are framed and imagined in contemporary discourses. By placing values, normative commitments, and experiential and plural ways of knowing from around the world at the centre of climate knowledge, we confront climate change with contested politics and the everyday foundations of action rather than just data.

引用

页码：343 / 352

页数：10

共 94 条

[1] Adam HN., 2018, ECON POLIT WEEKLY, V53, P16
[2] Adger WN, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511596667.002
[3] Agarwal A., 1991, GLOBAL WARMING UNEQU
[4] Agrawal A, 2009, ADAPTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE: THRESHOLDS, VALUES, GOVERNANCE, P350
[5] Agrawala S., 2005, BRIDGE TROUBLED WATE, P23
[6] Aldeia J., 2019, PROBLEMS SOC NATURE, V4, DOI [10.3389/fsoc.2019.00029, DOI 10.3389/FSOC.2019.00029]
[7] Anderies JM, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[8] Anderson K., 2017, PARIS OSLO DELIVERIN
[9] [Anonymous], 2013, STATES KNOWLEDGE COP
[10] [Anonymous], 2012, SPEC REP MAN RISKS E

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →