Evaluation of a Residential Mental Health Recovery Service in north Queensland

被引:15
作者
Heyeres, Marion [1 ]
Kinchin, Irina [2 ,3 ]
Whatley, Elise [4 ]
Brophy, Lisa [4 ,5 ]
Jago, Jon [4 ]
Wintzloff, Thomas [4 ]
Morton, Steve [4 ]
Mosby, Vinitta [1 ]
Gopalkrishnan, Narayan [1 ]
Tsey, Komla [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ, Coll Arts Soc & Educ, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[2] Cent Queensland Univ, Sch Hlth Med & Appl Sci, Ctr Indigenous Hlth Equ Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] James Cook Univ, Cairns Inst, Cairns, Qld, Australia
[4] Mind Australia Ltd, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
[5] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Ctr Mental Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
mental health; mental illness; service; recovery; community; subacute; step-up step-down; CARE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2018.00123
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Evidence shows that subacute mental health recovery occurs best when a person remains active within the community and fulfils meaningful and satisfying roles of their choosing. Several residential care services that incorporate these values have been established in Australia and overseas. Aims: This study describes (a) the development of an evaluation framework for a new subacute residential mental health recovery service in regional Australia and (b) reports on the formative evaluation outcomes. Methods: Continuous quality improvement and participatory research approaches informed all stages of the development of the evaluation framework. A program logic was established and subsequently tested for practicability. The resultant logic utilizes the Scottish Recovery Indicator 2 (SRI 2) service development tool, Individual Recovery Plans (IRPs), and the impact assessment of the service on psychiatric inpatient admissions (reported separately). Results: Service strengths included a recovery-focused practice that identifies and addresses the basic needs of residents (consumers). The consumers of the service were encouraged to develop their own goals and self-manage their recovery plans. The staff of the service were identified as working effectively in the context of the recovery process; the staff were seen as supported and valued. Areas for improvement included more opportunities for self-management for residents and more feedback from residents and carers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J PSYCHOSOCIAL R
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, SICK JOB MYTHS REAL
[3]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2015, NAT HLTH SURV 1 RES
[4]  
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2017, MENT HLTH SERV AUSTR
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, QUAL RES PSYCHOL, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[6]  
Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, 2017, DEV US PROGR LOG GUI
[7]  
Cluff R, 2013, CAIRNS HOSP MENTAL H
[8]   Following the Francis report: investigating patient experience of mental health in-patient care [J].
Csipke, E. ;
Williams, P. ;
Rose, D. ;
Koeser, L. ;
McCrone, P. ;
Wykes, T. ;
Craig, T. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 209 (01) :35-+
[10]   FORMATIVE AND PROCESS EVALUATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION AND DISEASE PREVENTION PROGRAMS [J].
DEHAR, MA ;
CASSWELL, S ;
DUIGNAN, P .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1993, 17 (02) :204-220