Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population

被引:17
作者
Chiu, P. K. [1 ]
Roobol, M. J. [2 ]
Nieboer, D. [3 ]
Teoh, J. Y. [1 ]
Yuen, S. K. [4 ]
Hou, S. M. [1 ]
Yiu, M. K. [4 ]
Ng, C. F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg, 4-F LCW Clinical Sci Bldg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PREVENTION TRIAL; HEALTH INDEX; PREDICTION; ERSPC; BIOPSY; ANTIGEN; COHORT; MEN; VOLUME; NG/ML;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.57
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To adapt the well-performing European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator to the Chinese setting and perform an external validation. METHODS: The original ERSPC risk calculator 3 (RC3) for prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade PCa (HGPCa) was applied to a development cohort of 3006 previously unscreened Hong Kong Chinese men with initial transrectal biopsies performed from 1997 to 2015, age 50-80 years, PSA 0.4-50 ng ml(-1) and prostate volume 10-150 ml. A simple adaptation to RC3 was performed and externally validated in a cohort of 2214 Chinese men from another Hong Kong hospital. The performance of the models were presented in calibration plots, area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: PCa and HGPCa was diagnosed in 16.7% (503/3006) and 7.8% (234/3006) men in the development cohort, and 20.2% (447/2204) and 9.7% (214/2204) men in the validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs using the original RC3 model in the development cohort were 0.75 and 0.84 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively, but the calibration plots showed considerable overestimation. In the external validation of the recalibrated RC3 model, excellent calibration was observed, and discrimination was good with AUCs of 0.76 and 0.85 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively. Decision curve analyses in the validation cohort showed net clinical benefit of the recalibrated RC3 model over PSA. CONCLUSIONS: A recalibrated ERSPC risk calculator for the Chinese population was developed, and it showed excellent discrimination, calibration and net clinical benefit in an external validation cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The management of active surveillance in prostate cancer: validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study risk calculator with the Spanish Urological Association Registry [J].
Borque-Fernando, Angel ;
Rubio-Briones, Jose ;
Mariano Esteban, Luis ;
Collado-Serra, Argimiro ;
Pallas-Costa, Yoni ;
Angel Lopez-Gonzalez, Pedro ;
Huguet-Perez, Jorge ;
Ignacio Sanz-Velez, Jose ;
Manuel Gil-Fabra, Jesus ;
Gomez-Gomez, Enrique ;
Quicios-Dorado, Cristina ;
Fumado, Lluis ;
Martinez-Breijo, Sara ;
Soto-Villalba, Juan .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (65) :108451-108462
[42]   The combined role of MRI prostate and prostate health index in improving detection of significant prostate cancer in a screening population of Chinese men [J].
Chiu, Peter K. F. ;
Lam, Thomas Y. T. ;
Ng, Chi-Fai ;
Teoh, Jeremy Y. C. ;
Cho, Carmen C. M. ;
Hung, Hiu-Yee ;
Hong, Cindy ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Chu, Winnie C. W. ;
Wong, Samuel Y. S. ;
Sung, Joseph J. Y. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2023, 25 (06) :674-679
[43]   Incorporating PHI in decision making: external validation of the Rotterdam risk calculators for detection of prostate cancer [J].
Rius Bilbao, Leire ;
Larracoechea, Urko Aguirre ;
Gomez, Carmen Valladares ;
Remmers, Sebastiaan ;
Medina, Carmen Mar .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
[44]   Novel Definitions of Low-risk and High-risk Prostate Cancer: Implications for the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Tool [J].
Pruthi, Deepak K. ;
Ankerst, Donna P. ;
Liss, Michael A. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) :52-53
[45]   An analysis of three different prostate cancer risk calculators applied prior to prostate biopsy: A Turkish cohort validation study [J].
Yildizhan, Mehmet ;
Balci, Melih ;
Eroglu, Unsal ;
Asil, Erem ;
Coser, Seref ;
Ozercan, Ali Yasin ;
Koseoglu, Burak ;
Guzel, Ozer ;
Asfuroglu, Ahmet ;
Tuncel, Altug .
ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 54 (02)
[46]   Interval cancers in the Antwerp European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer study, using a 6 year screening interval [J].
Nelen, Vera ;
Thys, Guy ;
Hermans, Annemie ;
D'Hooge, Kristien ;
Dourcy-Belle-Rose, Brigitte ;
Coebergh, Jan-Willem ;
Roobol, Monique ;
Denis, Louis .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) :3090-3094
[47]   Comparison between the European Randomized Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) risk calculators: Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer risk in a cohort of patients from Argentina [J].
Villota, P. M. Orbe ;
Centeno, J. A. Leiva ;
Lugones, J. ;
Minuzzi, P. G. ;
Varea, S. M. .
ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2024, 48 (03) :210-217
[48]   Digital Rectal Examination and the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer-a Study Based on 8 Years and Three Screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam [J].
Gosselaar, Claartje ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Wolters, Tineke ;
Schroder, Fritz H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (01) :139-147
[49]   Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators: A Performance Comparison in a Contemporary Screened Cohort [J].
Cavadas, Vitor ;
Osorio, Luis ;
Sabell, Francisco ;
Teves, Frederico ;
Branco, Frederico ;
Silva-Ramos, Miguel .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 58 (04) :551-558
[50]   Comparison of risk calculators from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer in a contemporary Canadian cohort [J].
Trottier, Greg ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
Lawrentschuk, Nathan ;
Bostroem, Peter J. ;
Fernandes, Kimberly A. ;
Finelli, Antonio ;
Chadwick, Karen ;
Evans, Andrew ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Toi, Ants ;
Zlotta, Alexandre R. ;
Fleshner, Neil E. .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) :E237-E244