Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population

被引:17
作者
Chiu, P. K. [1 ]
Roobol, M. J. [2 ]
Nieboer, D. [3 ]
Teoh, J. Y. [1 ]
Yuen, S. K. [4 ]
Hou, S. M. [1 ]
Yiu, M. K. [4 ]
Ng, C. F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg, 4-F LCW Clinical Sci Bldg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PREVENTION TRIAL; HEALTH INDEX; PREDICTION; ERSPC; BIOPSY; ANTIGEN; COHORT; MEN; VOLUME; NG/ML;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.57
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To adapt the well-performing European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator to the Chinese setting and perform an external validation. METHODS: The original ERSPC risk calculator 3 (RC3) for prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade PCa (HGPCa) was applied to a development cohort of 3006 previously unscreened Hong Kong Chinese men with initial transrectal biopsies performed from 1997 to 2015, age 50-80 years, PSA 0.4-50 ng ml(-1) and prostate volume 10-150 ml. A simple adaptation to RC3 was performed and externally validated in a cohort of 2214 Chinese men from another Hong Kong hospital. The performance of the models were presented in calibration plots, area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: PCa and HGPCa was diagnosed in 16.7% (503/3006) and 7.8% (234/3006) men in the development cohort, and 20.2% (447/2204) and 9.7% (214/2204) men in the validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs using the original RC3 model in the development cohort were 0.75 and 0.84 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively, but the calibration plots showed considerable overestimation. In the external validation of the recalibrated RC3 model, excellent calibration was observed, and discrimination was good with AUCs of 0.76 and 0.85 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively. Decision curve analyses in the validation cohort showed net clinical benefit of the recalibrated RC3 model over PSA. CONCLUSIONS: A recalibrated ERSPC risk calculator for the Chinese population was developed, and it showed excellent discrimination, calibration and net clinical benefit in an external validation cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Use of the Finasteride-Adjusted Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Mexican Referral Population: A Validation Study
    Liang, Yuanyuan
    Ketchum, Norma S.
    Louden, Christopher
    Jimenez-Rios, Miguel A.
    Thompson, Ian M.
    Camarena-Reynoso, Hector R.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 89 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [22] Prospective development of a prostate cancer risk calculator in a racially diverse population: The Kaiser Permanente Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator
    Presti, Joseph
    Alexeeff, Stacey
    Horton, Brandon
    Prausnitz, Stephanie
    Avins, Andrew L.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (11) : 847.e1 - 847.e8
  • [23] External validation of the Rotterdam prostate cancer risk calculator within a high-risk Dutch clinical cohort
    Hagens, Marinus J.
    Stelwagen, Piter J.
    Veerman, Hans
    Rynja, Sybren P.
    Smeenge, Martijn
    van der Noort, Vincent
    Roeleveld, Ton A.
    van Kesteren, Jolien
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Roobol, Monique J.
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [24] BioPrev-C - development and validation of a contemporary prostate cancer risk calculator
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Wettstein, Marian S.
    Kaufmann, Basil
    Lautenbach, Noemie
    Kaufmann, Ernest
    Saba, Karim
    Schmid, Florian A.
    Hotker, Andreas M.
    Muntener, Michael
    Umbehr, Martin
    Poyet, Cedric
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [25] On the use of prostate-specific antigen for screening of prostate cancer in European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    van Schaik, Ron H.
    Blijenberg, Bert G.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) : 3109 - 3119
  • [26] Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Chiu, Peter K.
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Venderbos, Lionne D. F.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (03) : 394 - 400
  • [27] Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Zappa, Marco
    Nelen, Vera
    Kwiatkowski, Maciej
    Lujan, Marcos
    Maattanen, Liisa
    Lilja, Hans
    Denis, Louis J.
    Recker, Franz
    Paez, Alvaro
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Puliti, Donella
    Villers, Arnauld
    Rebillard, Xavier
    Hakama, Matti
    Stenman, Ulf-Hakan
    Kujala, Paula
    Taari, Kimmo
    Aus, Gunnar
    Huber, Andreas
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    van Schaik, Ron H. N.
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Moss, Sue M.
    Auvinen, Anssi
    LANCET, 2014, 384 (9959) : 2027 - 2035
  • [28] PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population
    Perera, Marlon
    Mirchandani, Rohan
    Papa, Nathan
    Breemer, Geoff
    Effeindzourou, Anna
    Smith, Lewis
    Swindle, Peter
    Smith, Elliot
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1897 - 1902
  • [29] Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Finne, Patrik
    Fallah, Mandi
    Hakama, Matti
    Ciatto, Stefano
    Hugosson, Jonas
    de Koning, Harry
    Moss, Sue
    Nelen, Vera
    Auvinen, Anssi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2010, 46 (17) : 3102 - 3108
  • [30] Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    van der Kwast, Theo
    Kummerlin, Intan P.
    Kweldam, Charlotte F.
    van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (01) : 45 - 51