Adaptation and external validation of the European randomised study of screening for prostate cancer risk calculator for the Chinese population

被引:17
|
作者
Chiu, P. K. [1 ]
Roobol, M. J. [2 ]
Nieboer, D. [3 ]
Teoh, J. Y. [1 ]
Yuen, S. K. [4 ]
Hou, S. M. [1 ]
Yiu, M. K. [4 ]
Ng, C. F. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Urol, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Med Ctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Urol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, SH Ho Urol Ctr, Dept Surg, 4-F LCW Clinical Sci Bldg, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
PREVENTION TRIAL; HEALTH INDEX; PREDICTION; ERSPC; BIOPSY; ANTIGEN; COHORT; MEN; VOLUME; NG/ML;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2016.57
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: To adapt the well-performing European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator to the Chinese setting and perform an external validation. METHODS: The original ERSPC risk calculator 3 (RC3) for prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade PCa (HGPCa) was applied to a development cohort of 3006 previously unscreened Hong Kong Chinese men with initial transrectal biopsies performed from 1997 to 2015, age 50-80 years, PSA 0.4-50 ng ml(-1) and prostate volume 10-150 ml. A simple adaptation to RC3 was performed and externally validated in a cohort of 2214 Chinese men from another Hong Kong hospital. The performance of the models were presented in calibration plots, area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and decision curve analyses. RESULTS: PCa and HGPCa was diagnosed in 16.7% (503/3006) and 7.8% (234/3006) men in the development cohort, and 20.2% (447/2204) and 9.7% (214/2204) men in the validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs using the original RC3 model in the development cohort were 0.75 and 0.84 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively, but the calibration plots showed considerable overestimation. In the external validation of the recalibrated RC3 model, excellent calibration was observed, and discrimination was good with AUCs of 0.76 and 0.85 for PCa and HGPCa, respectively. Decision curve analyses in the validation cohort showed net clinical benefit of the recalibrated RC3 model over PSA. CONCLUSIONS: A recalibrated ERSPC risk calculator for the Chinese population was developed, and it showed excellent discrimination, calibration and net clinical benefit in an external validation cohort.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 104
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator: External Validation, Variability, and Clinical Significance
    Gomez-Gomez, Enrique
    Carrasco-Valiente, Julia
    Blanca-Pedregosa, Ana
    Barco-Sanchez, Beatriz
    Luis Fernandez-Rueda, Jose
    Molina-Abril, Helena
    Valero-Rosa, Jose
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Jose Requena-Tapia, Maria
    UROLOGY, 2017, 102 : 85 - 91
  • [2] Development and external multicenter validation of Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium prostate cancer risk calculator for initial prostate biopsy
    Chen, Rui
    Xie, Liping
    Xue, Wei
    Ye, Zhangqun
    Ma, Lulin
    Gao, Xu
    Ren, Shancheng
    Wang, Fubo
    Zhao, Lin
    Xu, Chuanliang
    Sun, Yinghao
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (09) : 416.e1 - 416.e7
  • [3] External Validation of the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group Risk Calculator and the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in a Swedish Population-based Screening Cohort
    Engel, Jan Chandra
    Palsdottir, Thorgerdur
    Ankerst, Donna
    Remmers, Sebastiaan
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Chellappa, Venkatesh
    Egevad, Lars
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Eklund, Martin
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 1 - 7
  • [4] Validating the European randomised study for screening of prostate cancer (ERSPC) risk calculator in a contemporary South African cohort
    Kowlessur, Bhavish
    Phull, Manraj
    Patel, Bhavin
    Henry, Michelle
    Lazarus, John
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (07) : 1711 - 1718
  • [5] External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculators in a Chinese cohort
    Zhu, Yao
    Wang, Jin-You
    Shen, Yi-Jun
    Dai, Bo
    Ma, Chun-Guang
    Xiao, Wen-Jun
    Lin, Guo-Wen
    Yao, Xu-Dong
    Zhang, Shi-Lin
    Ye, Ding-Wei
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 14 (05) : 738 - 744
  • [6] Prediction of Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the ERSPC Risk Calculator in a Contemporary Dutch Clinical Cohort
    Gayet, Maudy
    Mannaerts, Christophe K.
    Nieboer, Daan
    Beerlage, Harrie P.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Mulders, Peter F. A.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (02): : 228 - 234
  • [7] The use of European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer calculator as a diagnostic tool for prostate biopsy indication
    Breza, J.
    Subin, F.
    Bernadic, M.
    Tomas, M.
    Pindak, D.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2019, 120 (05): : 331 - 335
  • [8] Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort
    Poyet, Cedric
    Nieboer, Daan
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Wiederkehr, Caroline
    Wettstein, Marian S.
    Largo, Remo
    Wild, Peter
    Sulser, Tullio
    Hermanns, Thomas
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 117 (03) : 401 - 408
  • [9] Comparing the prediction of prostate biopsy outcome using the Chinese Prostate Cancer Consortium (CPCC) Risk Calculator and the Asian adapted Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) Risk Calculator in Chinese and European men
    Chen, Rui
    Verbeek, Jan F. M.
    Yang, Yue
    Song, Zijian
    Sun, Yinghao
    Roobol, Monique J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [10] Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schroder, F. H.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Hamdy, Freddie
    Neal, David
    Donovan, Jenny
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Ankerst, Donna
    Bartsch, George
    Klocker, Helmut
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Benchikh, Amine
    Salama, Gilles
    Villers, Arnauld
    Freedland, Stephen J.
    Moreira, Daniel M.
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Lilja, Hans
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (02) : 149 - 155