The Differential Response of Surface Fluxes from Agro-Ecosystems in Response to Local Environmental Conditions

被引:0
作者
Alfieri, Joseph G. [1 ]
Kustas, William P. [1 ]
Prueger, John [2 ]
Baker, John [3 ]
Hatfield, Jerry [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA Agr Res Serv, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
[2] USDA Agr Res Serv, Natl Lab Agr & Environm, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] USDA Agr Res Serv, Soil & Water Management Res, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
来源
FOUR DECADES OF PROGRESS IN MONITORING AND MODELING OF PROCESSES IN THE SOIL-PLANT-ATMOSPHERE SYSTEM: APPLICATIONS AND CHALLENGES | 2013年 / 19卷
关键词
evapotranspiration; surface fluxes; spatial variability; AGRICULTURAL WATER-USE;
D O I
10.1016/j.proenv.2013.06.027
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Meeting the competing demands for freshwater of the urban, industrial, and agricultural communities is increasingly challenging as the global population continues to grow and the need for potable water, food, fiber, and fuel grows with it. One of the keys to meeting these demands is maximizing the efficiency of water use in agricultural applications. Toward this end, a thorough understanding of the factors driving evapotranspiration and their response to spatiotemporal variations in local environmental conditions is needed for the development and validation of numerical and remote sensing-based models. Moreover, because these exchange processes are strongly nonlinear, scaling measurements collected at one scale to another remains a nontrivial task. In an effort to identify the key environmental drivers controlling the latent heat flux (lambda E) from agro-ecosystems and their potential impacts on upscaling in-situ flux measurements, eddy covariance and micrometeorological data collected over maize and soy at three distinct sites located in Maryland, Iowa, and Minnesota, respectively were evaluated for the years between 2007 and 2011. The magnitudes of the evaporative fluxes were comparable for measurements collected during clear-sky days with similar environmental conditions; on average, the measurements of lambda E agreed to within 50 W m(-2), or approximately 10%. When considered in terms of evaporative fraction (f(e)), however, there were marked differences among the sites. For example, while the magnitude and diurnal pattern of f(e) for mature maize at the Minnesota site was nearly constant (f(e) = 0.66) during the day, f(e) at both the Maryland and Iowa site increased steadily during the day from a minimum value near 0.68 at midmorning to peak value of 0.87 in the afternoon. These differences appear to be primarily linked to differences in soil moisture and vegetation density at the various sites. As such, this research underscores the impact of local environmental conditions in controlling land-atmosphere exchange processes. It also underscores the importance accurately describing local environmental conditions when modeling surface fluxes. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 245
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Variability in the environmental factors driving evapotranspiration from a grazed rangeland during severe drought conditions [J].
Alfieri, Joseph G. ;
Blanken, Peter D. ;
Yates, David N. ;
Steffen, Konrad .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2007, 8 (02) :207-220
[2]   Examining strategies to improve the carbon balance of corn/soybean agriculture using eddy covariance and mass balance techniques [J].
Baker, JM ;
Griffis, TJ .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2005, 128 (3-4) :163-177
[3]   Analysis of feedback mechanisms in land-atmosphere interaction [J].
Brubaker, KL ;
Entekhabi, D .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1996, 32 (05) :1343-1357
[4]   Satisfying future water demands for agriculture [J].
de Fraiture, Charlotte ;
Wichelns, Dennis .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (04) :502-511
[5]   Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use [J].
Fereres, Elias ;
Auxiliadora Soriano, Maria .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2007, 58 (02) :147-159
[6]   Comparison of Field-scale Herbicide Runoff and Volatilization Losses: An Eight-Year Field Investigation [J].
Gish, Timothy J. ;
Prueger, John H. ;
Daughtry, Craig S. T. ;
Kustas, William P. ;
McKee, Lynn G. ;
Russ, Andrew L. ;
Hatfield, Jerry L. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2011, 40 (05) :1432-1442
[7]   Water Access, Water Scarcity, and Climate Change [J].
Mukheibir, Pierre .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 45 (05) :1027-1039
[8]   Human appropriation of renewable fresh water [J].
Postel, SL ;
Daily, GC ;
Ehrlich, PR .
SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5250) :785-788
[9]  
Schaible GD, 2012, USDA ERS ECONOMIC IN, V99
[10]   Global water resources:: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth [J].
Vörösmarty, CJ ;
Green, P ;
Salisbury, J ;
Lammers, RB .
SCIENCE, 2000, 289 (5477) :284-288