Investigating India's pollution-intensive 'dirty' trade specialisation: analysis with 'revealed symmetric comparative advantage' index

被引:17
作者
Banerjee, Suvajit [1 ]
Hazra, Somnath [2 ]
Khan, Muhammad Aamir [3 ]
ul Husnain, Muhammad Iftikhar [3 ]
机构
[1] Visva Bharati Univ, Dept Econ & Polit, Vidya Bhavana, Santini Ketan, West Bengal, India
[2] Jadavpur Univ, Sch Oceanog Studies, Kolkata, India
[3] Comsats Univ, Dept Econ, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Dirty specialisation; Revealed symmetric comparative advantage; Merchandise exports; Pollution haven; India; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; CO2; EMISSIONS; CHINA; DEMAND; EAST;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-021-12790-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study intends to explore India's comparative advantage in the pollution-intensive product export with temporal and spatial analysis by applying an alternative measure of revealed comparative advantage index. The emission-intensive manufacturing commodities are mainly chosen as per the list published by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of India to draw some inferences on India's pollution haven characteristics. For the spatial analysis, the 'dirty' comparative advantage is calculated for all the BRICS countries for the year 2017, and for the temporal analysis, the index value is calculated for 42 product groups at 3 digit SITC level from 2009 to 2017 to examine the structure of 'dirty' specialisation in India and its change over time. India is found at the top among the BRICS members for a maximum of 16 in 25 products. Among these 25 sectors, Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa are found having a comparative advantage in 4, 12, 11 and 10 products, respectively. In these comparatively advantageous products, Brazil ranked one in 75% and three in 25% of products. Russia ranked one in 33% and two in 67% of products. India among the BRICS members stood 1st at 62.5, 2nd and 3rd both at 18.75% cases, respectively. Findings reveal that pollution-intensive trade-exposed sectors successfully absorbed the stringent environmental regulation-shocks which brought in an additional burden of compliance cost upon trade competitiveness. The results of this study are more insightful for evaluating India's recent initiatives for stricter environmental regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:30153 / 30167
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Technology and endowments as determinants of comparative advantage: Evidence from Mexico [J].
Amoroso, Nicolas ;
Chiquiar, Daniel ;
Ramos-Francia, Manuel .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2011, 22 (02) :164-196
[2]   Effects of export concentration on CO2 emissions in developed countries: an empirical analysis [J].
Apergis, Nicholas ;
Can, Muhlis ;
Gozgor, Giray ;
Lau, Chi Keung Marco .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (14) :14106-14116
[3]   Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and North African countries [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Ben Youssef, Adel ;
M'henni, Hatem ;
Rault, Christophe .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 45 :342-349
[4]   The socioeconomic future of deltas in a changing environment [J].
Arto, Inaki ;
Garcia-Muros, Xaquin ;
Cazcarro, Ignacio ;
Gonzalez-Eguino, Mikel ;
Markandya, Anil ;
Hazra, Somnath .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 648 :1284-1296
[5]  
Ashish A., 2015, INDIAN J EC BUSINESS, V14, P115
[6]   TRADE LIBERALISATION AND REVEALED COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALASSA, B .
MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1965, 33 (02) :99-123
[7]   CONSISTENCY TESTS OF ALTERNATIVE MEASURES OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BALLANCE, RH ;
FORSTNER, H ;
MURRAY, T .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (01) :157-161
[8]  
Banerjee Suvajit, 2020, International Journal of Sustainable Economy, V12, P297, DOI 10.1504/IJSE.2020.111539
[9]  
BANERJEE S, 2021, STRUCT CHANGE ECON D
[10]  
BANERJEE S, 2021, ENVIRON SCI POLLUT R