Prior intention can locally tune inhibitory processes in the primary motor cortex: direct evidence from combined TMS-EEG

被引:67
作者
Bonnard, M. [1 ]
Spieser, L. [1 ]
Meziane, H. B. [1 ]
de Graaf, J. B. [1 ]
Pailhous, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille, CNRS, UMR 6193, Mediterranean Inst Cognit Neurosci INCM, F-13402 Marseille 20, France
关键词
combined TMS-EEG; intention; motor cortex; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE-VARIATION; EVENT-RELATED DESYNCHRONIZATION; MOVEMENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SILENT PERIOD; RESPONSES; SYNCHRONIZATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06864.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Human subjects are able to prepare cognitively to resist an involuntary movement evoked by a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1) by anticipatory selective modulation of corticospinal excitability. Uncovering how the sensorimotor cortical network is involved in this process could reveal directly how a prior intention can tune the intrinsic dynamics of M1 before any peripheral intervention. Here, we used combined TMS-EEG to study the cortical integrative processes that are engaged both in the preparation to react to TMS (Resist vs. Assist) and in the subsequent response to it. During the preparatory period, the contingent negative variation (CNV) amplitude was found to be smaller over central electrodes (FC1, C1, Cz) when preparing to resist compared with preparing to assist the evoked movement whereas alpha-oscillation power was similar in the two conditions. Following TMS, the amplitude of the TMS evoked-N100 component was higher in the Resist than in the Assist condition for some central electrodes (FCz, C1, Cz, CP1, CP3). Moreover, for six out of eight subjects, a single-trial-based analysis revealed a negative correlation between CNV amplitude and N100 amplitude. In conclusion, prior intention can tune the excitability of M1. When subjects prepare to resist a TMS-evoked movement, the anticipatory processes cause a decreased cortical excitability by locally increasing the inhibitory processes.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 923
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability [J].
Abbruzzese, G ;
Trompetto, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (04) :307-321
[2]   Cortical sensorimotor interactions during the expectancy of a Go/No-Go task: Effects of painful stimuli [J].
Babiloni, C ;
Brancucci, A ;
Arendt-Nielsen, L ;
Del Percio, C ;
Babiloni, F ;
Pascual-Marqui, RD ;
Sabbatini, G ;
Rossini, PM ;
Chen, ACN .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 118 (05) :925-935
[3]   Anticipatory cortical responses during the expectancy of a predictable painful stimulation. A high-resolution electroencephalography study [J].
Babiloni, C ;
Brancucci, A ;
Babiloni, F ;
Capotosto, P ;
Carducci, F ;
Cincotti, F ;
Arendt-Nielsen, L ;
Chen, ACN ;
Rossini, PM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 18 (06) :1692-1700
[4]   Slow cortical potential shifts preceding sensorimotor interactions [J].
Babiloni, CB ;
Brancucci, A ;
Capotosto, P ;
Romani, GL ;
Arendt-Nielsen, L ;
Chen, ACN ;
Rossini, PM .
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN, 2005, 65 (04) :309-316
[5]  
BASTIAANSEN MCM, 1999, HANDB EL CL, V6, P203
[6]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation evokes giant inhibitory potentials in children [J].
Bender, S ;
Basseler, K ;
Sebastian, I ;
Resch, F ;
Kammer, T ;
Oelkers-Ax, R ;
Weisbrod, M .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2005, 58 (01) :58-67
[7]  
Birbaumer N., 1997, Brain and Behavior Past, Present, and Future, P25
[8]  
Bonnard M, 2004, REV NEUROSCIENCE, V15, P371
[9]   Direct evidence for a binding between cognitive and motor functions in humans: A TMS study [J].
Bonnard, M ;
Camus, M ;
de Graaf, J ;
Pailhous, J .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (08) :1207-1216
[10]   Wait and see [J].
Brunia, CHM ;
van Boxtel, GJM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 43 (01) :59-75