The effect of primary midwife-led care on women's experience of childbirth: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial

被引:79
|
作者
McLachlan, H. L. [1 ,2 ]
Forster, D. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Davey, M-A [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Farrell, T. [3 ]
Flood, M. [1 ,2 ]
Shafiei, T. [1 ,2 ]
Waldenstrom, U. [5 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Judith Lumley Ctr, 215 Franklin Sreet, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[3] Royal Womens Hosp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Consultat Council Obstet & Paediat Mortal & Morbi, Dept Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Div Reprod & Perinatal Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Birth experience; caseload midwifery; continuity of care; midwife-led care; primary midwife care; randomised controlled trial; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; CESAREAN-SECTION; SATISFACTION; LABOR; EXPECTATIONS; RISK; PAIN; CONTINUITY;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.13713
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo determine the effect of primary midwife-led care (caseload midwifery') on women's experiences of childbirth. DesignRandomised controlled trial. SettingTertiary care women's hospital in Melbourne, Australia. PopulationA total of 2314 low-risk pregnant women. MethodsWomen randomised to caseload care received antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a primary midwife, with some care provided by a back-up' midwife. Women in standard care received midwifery-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care or community-based medical care. Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome of the study was caesarean section. This paper presents a secondary outcome, women's experience of childbirth. Women's views and experiences were sought using seven-point rating scales via postal questionnaires 2 months after the birth. ResultsA total of 2314 women were randomised between September 2007 and June 2010; 1156 to caseload and 1158 to standard care. Response rates to the follow-up questionnaire were 88 and 74%, respectively. Women in the caseload group were more positive about their overall birth experience than women in the standard care group (adjusted odds ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.22-1.84). They also felt more in control during labour, were more proud of themselves, less anxious, and more likely to have a positive experience of pain. ConclusionsCompared with standard maternity care, caseload midwifery may improve women's experiences of childbirth. Tweetable abstractPrimary midwife-led care (caseload midwifery') improves women's experiences of childbirth. Tweetable abstract Primary midwife-led care (caseload midwifery') improves women's experiences of childbirth.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial
    Forster, Della A.
    McLachlan, Helen L.
    Davey, Mary-Ann
    Biro, Mary Anne
    Farrell, Tanya
    Gold, Lisa
    Flood, Maggie
    Shafiei, Touran
    Waldenstrom, Ulla
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [2] Continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) increases women’s satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care: results from the COSMOS randomised controlled trial
    Della A. Forster
    Helen L. McLachlan
    Mary-Ann Davey
    Mary Anne Biro
    Tanya Farrell
    Lisa Gold
    Maggie Flood
    Touran Shafiei
    Ulla Waldenström
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [3] Women's experience of midwife-led counselling and its influence on childbirth fear: A qualitative study
    Larsson, Birgitta
    Hildingsson, Ingegerd
    Ternstrom, Elin
    Rubertsson, Christine
    Karlstrom, Annika
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2019, 32 (01) : E88 - E94
  • [4] Antenatal cardiotocography in primary midwife-led care: Women's satisfaction
    Neppelenbroek, Elise M.
    Ammerlaan, Anouk J. M.
    van Der Heijden, Olivier W. H.
    van Der Pijl, Marit S. G.
    Kaiser, Anouk
    de Jonge, Ank
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2023, 50 (04): : 798 - 807
  • [5] Hyperemesis in Pregnancy Study: a pilot randomised controlled trial of midwife-led outpatient care
    McParlin, Catherine
    Carrick-Sen, Debbie
    Steen, Ian N.
    Robson, Stephen C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 200 : 6 - 10
  • [6] Effects of continuity of care by a primary midwife (caseload midwifery) on caesarean section rates in women of low obstetric risk: the COSMOS randomised controlled trial
    McLachlan, H. L.
    Forster, D. A.
    Davey, M. A.
    Farrell, T.
    Gold, L.
    Biro, M. A.
    Albers, L.
    Flood, M.
    Oats, J.
    Waldenstrom, U.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (12) : 1483 - 1492
  • [7] Women's experience of childbirth - A five year follow-up of the randomised controlled trial "Ready for Child Trial''
    Maimburg, Rikke Damkjaer
    Vaeth, Michael
    Dahlen, Hannah
    WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2016, 29 (05) : 450 - 454
  • [8] Women's experience and satisfaction with midwife-led maternity care: a cross-sectional survey in China
    Liu, Ying
    Li, Tengteng
    Guo, Nafei
    Jiang, Hui
    Li, Yuehong
    Xu, Chenying
    Yao, Xiao
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [9] The effect of gestational weight gain on likelihood of referral to obstetric care for women eligible for primary, midwife-led care after antenatal booking
    Daemers, Darie O. A.
    Wijnen, Hennie A. A.
    van Limbeek, Evelien B. M.
    Bude, Luc M.
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.
    Spaanderman, Marc E. A.
    de Vries, Raymond G.
    MIDWIFERY, 2016, 34 : 123 - 132
  • [10] The use of midwife-led primary antenatal care by obese women in The Netherlands: An explorative cohort study
    Daemers, Darie O. A.
    van Limbeek, Evelien B. M.
    Bude, Luc M.
    Wijnen, Hennie A. A.
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J.
    de Vries, Raymond G.
    MIDWIFERY, 2017, 49 : 72 - 78