Evaluation of a prostate biopsy strategy for cancer detection using a computer simulation system with virtual needle biopsy for three-dimensional prostate models

被引:2
作者
Noguchi, Masanori
Deguchi, Daisuke
Toriwaki, Junichiro
Mori, Kensaku
Mekada, Yoshito
Matsuoka, Kei
机构
[1] Kurume Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Kurume, Fukuoka 8300011, Japan
[2] Nagoya Univ, Grad Sch Informat Sci, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[3] Chukyo Univ, Sch Life Syst Sci & Technol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
computer simulation; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; three-dimensional models;
D O I
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01561.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim: We evaluated a prostate biopsy strategy for cancer detection using a computer simulation system with virtual needle biopsy for three-dimensional (3D) prostate models. Methods: Two 3D prostate models with a volume of 25 cc or 50 cc were constructed from computed tomographic images of radical prostatectomy specimens. The peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ) were arranged in the prostate models according to the anatomical information. Four thousand patterns of cancer lesions were automatically inserted into each prostate model with a proportion of 75% in PZ and 25% in TZ. Average hit rates (AHR) in prostate models were evaluated both with an increased number of biopsy cores and various angles of virtual needle biopsy. The influence of adding secondary tumors for hit rates was also evaluated. Results: For both sizes, the laterally angled biopsy in 4-8 core biopsy schemes showed higher AHR than the vertical plane biopsy, while the vertical plane biopsy in 10-18 core biopsy schemes showed higher AHR than the laterally angled biopsy. A higher number of biopsy cores increased the AHR of secondary tumors. Conclusions: Our results suggest that it is important in prostate cancer detection to change the needle placement according to the number of biopsy cores and the size of the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:1296 / 1303
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] SCREENING FOR PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA WITH PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN
    BRAWER, MK
    CHETNER, MP
    BEATIE, J
    BUCHNER, DM
    VESSELLA, RL
    LANGE, PH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) : 841 - 845
  • [2] DETECTION OF ORGAN-CONFINED PROSTATE-CANCER IS INCREASED THROUGH PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN-BASED SCREENING
    CATALONA, WJ
    SMITH, DS
    RATLIFF, TL
    BASLER, JW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (08): : 948 - 954
  • [3] Does increased needle biopsy sampling of the prostate detect a higher number of potentially insignificant tumors?
    Chan, TY
    Chan, DY
    Lecksell, K
    Stutzman, RE
    Epstein, JI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) : 2181 - 2184
  • [4] Prospective evaluation of lateral biopsies of the peripheral zone for prostate cancer detection
    Chang, JJ
    Shinohara, K
    Bhargava, V
    Presti, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (06) : 2111 - 2114
  • [5] Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis
    Chen, ME
    Troncoso, P
    Johnston, DA
    Tang, K
    Babaian, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (06) : 2168 - 2175
  • [6] COMPUTER-SIMULATION OF THE PROBABILITY OF DETECTING LOW-VOLUME CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE WITH 6 RANDOM SYSTEMATIC CORE BIOPSIES
    DANESHGARI, F
    TAYLOR, GD
    MILLER, GJ
    CRAWFORD, ED
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (04) : 604 - 609
  • [7] Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate
    Eskew, LA
    Bare, RL
    McCullough, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) : 199 - 202
  • [8] Prevalence and predictors of a positive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate
    Fleshner, NE
    OSullivan, M
    Fair, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) : 505 - 508
  • [9] Gustafsson O, 1998, SCAND J UROL NEPHROL, V32, P373
  • [10] RANDOM SYSTEMATIC VERSUS DIRECTED ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANS-RECTAL CORE BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE
    HODGE, KK
    MCNEAL, JE
    TERRIS, MK
    STAMEY, TA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 142 (01) : 71 - 75