Determinants of physician empathy during medical education: hypothetical conclusions from an exploratory qualitative survey of practicing physicians

被引:63
作者
Ahrweiler, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Neumann, Melanie [3 ]
Goldblatt, Hadass [4 ]
Hahn, Eckhart G. [5 ]
Scheffer, Christian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witten Herdecke, Fac Hlth, Integrated Curriculum Anthroposoph Med, Inst Integrat Med,Sch Med, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[2] Augusta Kranken Anstalt, Med Klin, D-44791 Bochum, Germany
[3] Univ Witten Herdecke, Fac Hlth, D-58448 Witten, Germany
[4] Univ Haifa, Fac Social Welf & Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[5] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Klin 1, Gesell Berufliche Fortbildung Forsch & Entwicklun, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[6] Univ Witten Herdecke, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Ctr Educ Res, D-58448 Witten, Germany
关键词
Empathy; Medical education; Physician; Physician-patient relationship; Health communication; Promoting factors; Inhibiting factors; PATIENT ENABLEMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; PRACTITIONER EMPATHY; HEALTH-CARE; STUDENTS; COMMUNICATION; ASSOCIATION; DISTRESS; OUTCOMES; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-14-122
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Empathy is an outcome-relevant physician characteristic and thus a crucial component of high-quality communication in health care. However, the factors that promote and inhibit the development of empathy during medical education have not been extensively researched. Also, currently there is no explicit research on the perspective of practicing physicians on the subject. Therefore the aim of our study was to explore physicians' views of the positive and negative influences on the development of empathy during their medical education, as well as in their everyday work as physicians. Method: We administered a written Qualitative Short Survey to 63 physicians in seven specialties. They were able to respond anonymously. Our open-ended question was: "What educational content in the course of your studies and/or your specialist training had a positive or negative effect on your empathy?" We analyzed the data using thematic content analysis following Mayring's approach. Results: Forty-two physicians took part in our survey. All together, they mentioned 68 specific factors (37 positive, 29 negative, 2 neutral) from which six themes emerged: 1. In general, medical education does not promote the development of empathy. 2. Recognizing the psycho-social dimensions of care fosters empathy. 3. Interactions with patients in medical practice promote empathy. 4. Physicians' active self-development through reflective practice helps the development of empathy. 5. Interactions with colleagues can both promote and inhibit empathy through their role modeling of empathic and non-empathic behavior. 6. Stress, time pressure, and adverse working conditions are detrimental to empathy development. Conclusions: Our results provide an overview of what might influence the development of clinical empathy, as well as hypothetical conclusions about how to promote it. Reflective practice seems to be lacking in current medical curricula and could be incorporated. Raising physicians' awareness of the psycho-social dimension of disease, and of the impact of peer influence and role modeling, seems promising in this regard, too. Stress and well-being seem to be closely related to physician empathy, and their modulation must take into account individual, social, and organizational factors. Further research should investigate whether or how these hypothetical conclusions can deepen our understanding of the determinants of physician empathy in order to help its promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Afghani Behnoosh, 2011, Educ Health (Abingdon), V24, P544
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V117, P756, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182147865
[3]   The Impact of a Program in Mindful Communication on Primary Care Physicians [J].
Beckman, Howard B. ;
Wendland, Melissa ;
Mooney, Christopher ;
Krasner, Michael S. ;
Quill, Timothy E. ;
Suchman, Anthony L. ;
Epstein, Ronald M. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (06) :815-819
[4]   A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months in patients going to the Glasgow homoeopathic hospital [J].
Bikker, AP ;
Mercer, SW ;
Reilly, D .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 2005, 11 (04) :591-600
[5]   The legacy of altruism in health care: the promotion of empathy, prosociality and humanism [J].
Burks, Derek J. ;
Kobus, Amy M. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (03) :317-325
[6]   Communication skills training for emergency medicine residents [J].
Cinar, Orhan ;
Ak, Mehmet ;
Sutcigil, Levent ;
Congologlu, Emel Dovyap ;
Canbaz, Hayri ;
Kilic, Erden ;
Ozmenler, Kamil Nahit .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (01) :9-13
[7]   Assessment of empathy in a standardized-patient examination [J].
Colliver, JA ;
Willis, MS ;
Robbs, RS ;
Cohen, DS ;
Swartz, MH .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1998, 10 (01) :8-11
[8]  
Dillman DA., 2000, Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method
[9]  
Flick U, 2005, COMPANION QUALITATIV, P13
[10]  
Frank J.R., 2005, CANMEDS 2005 PHYS CO, P27