The impact of decision support system features on user overconfidence and risky behavior

被引:21
作者
Chen, Chi-Wen [1 ]
Koufaris, Marios [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Baruch Coll, Zicklin Sch Business, New York, NY 10010 USA
关键词
decision support systems; overconfidence; risky behavior; competition; choice; system familiarity; PERCEIVED DIAGNOSTICITY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; COGNITIVE BIASES; ILLUSION; FAMILIARITY; DESIGN; ONLINE; MODEL; OVERESTIMATE; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1057/ejis.2014.30
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
There is considerable research on how Decision Support Systems (DSSs) enable users to make better decisions. However, there is less focus on the possibility that some of their features may introduce biases and encourage suboptimal user behavior. We report on an experimental study that examines three DSS features that are generally considered beneficial to the user: the degree of choice the system provides to the user, the presence of competition among concurrent users, and the use of training to increase system familiarity. We hypothesize that the three DSS features may increase risky behavior (measured as the amount invested in a stock investment task with random outcomes) and overconfidence, conceptualized as the illusion of control, the phenomenon whereby people believe their chances of success at a task are greater than would be warranted by objective analysis. Our results confirm the effects of the three DSS features on risky behavior but only degree of choice impacts overconfidence. Moreover, overconfidence does not appear to mediate the impact of the DSS features on risky behavior. Finally, we hypothesize and confirm that, controlling for the effect of actual performance, overconfidence increases user satisfaction with the decision-making process and outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:607 / 623
页数:17
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Adipat B, 2011, MIS QUART, V35, P99
[2]   Is Query Reuse Potentially Harmful? Anchoring and Adjustment in Adapting Existing Database Queries [J].
Allen, Gove ;
Parsons, Jeffrey .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (01) :56-77
[3]   JUDGMENT OF CONTINGENCY IN DEPRESSED AND NONDEPRESSED STUDENTS - SADDER BUT WISER [J].
ALLOY, LB ;
ABRAMSON, LY .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1979, 108 (04) :441-485
[4]   The Digitization of Healthcare: Boundary Risks, Emotion, and Consumer Willingness to Disclose Personal Health Information [J].
Anderson, Catherine L. ;
Agarwal, Ritu .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) :469-490
[5]   Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach [J].
Arnott, D .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2006, 16 (01) :55-78
[6]  
Barkhi R., 2002, J MANAGE INFORM SYST, V18, P259
[7]   Effectiveness of decision support systems. development or reliance effect? [J].
Barr, SH ;
Sharda, R .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1997, 21 (02) :133-146
[8]   Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation [J].
Beaudry, A ;
Pinsonneault, A .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2005, 29 (03) :493-524
[9]   Dynamic Interaction in Decision Support: Effects on Perceived Diagnosticity and Confidence in Unstructured Domains [J].
Beemer, Brandon A. ;
Gregg, Dawn G. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2013, 43 (01) :74-84
[10]  
BERNILE G, 2014, WHAT DOESNT KILL YOU