Improving Methods for Measuring Quality of Care A Patient-Centered Approach in Chronic Disease

被引:24
作者
Bokhour, Barbara G. [1 ,2 ]
Pugh, Mary Jo [3 ,4 ]
Rao, Jaya K. [5 ,6 ]
Avetisyan, Ruzan [2 ]
Berlowitz, Dan R. [1 ,2 ]
Kazis, Lewis E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Edith Nourse Rogers Mem Vet Aff Med Ctr, Ctr Hlth Qual Outcomes & Econ Res, Bedford, MA USA
[2] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] S Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Vet Evidence Based Res Disseminat Implementat Ctr, Res Enhancement Award Program, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[5] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Healthy Aging Program, Natl Ctr Chron Dis Prevent & Hlth Promot, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
quality indicators; patient-centered care; chronic disease; epilepsy; qualitative methods; EPILEPSY; IMPACT; VIEWS; AGREE;
D O I
10.1177/1077558708327174
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
As health care systems seek to provide patient-centered care as a cornerstone of quality, how to measure this aspect of quality has become a concern. Previous development of quality indicators for treating individual chronic disease has rarely included patient perspectives on quality of care. Using epilepsy as an exemplar, the authors sought to develop an approach to measuring patient-centered quality of care. They conducted six focus groups with adults with epilepsy. Using qualitative methods, the authors initially identified 10 patient-generated quality indicators, 5 of which were subsequently rated, along with literature-based quality indicators, by an expert panel using a modified RAND appropriateness methodology. The authors discuss similarities and differences in aspects of care patients and providers value as essential for good quality. The process presented in this article may serve as a model for incorporating patient perceptions of quality into the future development of quality indicators for chronic diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 166
页数:20
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]  
Patton M. Q., 2002, Qualitative research and evaluation methods, V3rd, P339
[32]   Communicating the uncertainty of harms and benefits of medical interventions [J].
Politi, Mary C. ;
Han, Paul K. J. ;
Col, Nananda F. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2007, 27 (05) :681-695
[33]   What constitutes high quality of care for adults with epilepsy? [J].
Pugh, M. J. V. ;
Berlowitz, D. R. ;
Montouris, G. ;
Bokhour, B. ;
Cramer, J. A. ;
Bohm, V. ;
Bollinger, M. ;
Helmers, S. ;
Ettinger, A. ;
Meador, K. J. ;
Fountain, N. ;
Boggs, J. ;
Tatum, W. O., IV ;
Knoefel, J. ;
Harden, C. ;
Mattson, R. H. ;
Kazis, L. .
NEUROLOGY, 2007, 69 (21) :2020-2027
[34]   Potentially inappropriate antiepileptic drugs for elderly patients with epilepsy [J].
Pugh, MJV ;
Cramer, J ;
Knoefel, J ;
Charbonneau, A ;
Mandell, A ;
Kazis, L ;
Berlowitz, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2004, 52 (03) :417-422
[35]   Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance - A meta-analysis [J].
Roter, DL ;
Hall, JA ;
Merisca, R ;
Nordstrom, B ;
Cretin, D ;
Svarstad, B .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (08) :1138-1161
[36]   The primary care assessment surrey - Tests of data quality and measurement performance [J].
Safran, DG ;
Kosinski, M ;
Tarlov, AR ;
Rogers, WH ;
Taira, DA ;
Lieberman, N ;
Ware, JE .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (05) :728-739
[37]   Experiences of persons with epilepsy and their families as they look for medical and community care: A focus group study from South Carolina [J].
Sample, Pat L. ;
Ferguson, Pamela L. ;
Wagner, Janelle L. ;
Pickelsimer, E. Elisabeth ;
Selassie, Anbesaw W. .
EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2006, 9 (04) :649-662
[38]   Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy [J].
Shekelle, PG ;
Chassin, MR ;
Park, RE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 1998, 14 (04) :707-727
[39]  
Smedley B.D., 2003, Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care
[40]   Patient perceptions of the quality of health services [J].
Sofaer, S ;
Firminger, K .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 26 :513-559