Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM

被引:60
作者
Bekkers, R
Verspagen, B
Smits, J
机构
[1] Dial Innovatie & Interactie, NL-3581 ND Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, ECIS, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
innovation strategies; patents; telecommunications; GSM; essential IPR;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00007-1
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardization in the telecommunications industry. We take the global system for mobile communications (GSM) case as a highly relevant example, being part of a high-tech industry in which standards play a large role. In the process of designing the GSM standard, a lot of attention has been given to IPRs, mainly to avoid a situation in which a single IPR holder could hamper or even totally block the development of the standard. Nevertheless, the ultimate GSM standard contains a large amount of so-called 'essential IPRs', i.e., IPRs without which the implementation of GSM products is impossible. The paper provides a general discussion of the development of GSM and presents a database on the essential IPRs in the GSM standard. This database has been compiled on the basis of international patent statistics, and the data that manufacturers have supplied to European Telecommunications Standards Institute, the European standardization body responsible for defining the GSM standard. We use this database to assess the dynamic IPR position of firms in the original GSM standard and its subsequent development. We use the GSM case to underline the importance of a general European policy with regard to IPRs and standardization, and derive several concrete recommendations for such a policy. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on Domestic Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Sector [J].
Gamba, Simona .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 99 :15-27
[32]   Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome [J].
Williams, Heidi L. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 121 (01) :1-27
[33]   Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs [J].
Teixeira, Aurora A. C. ;
Ferreira, Cada .
JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2019, 4 (03) :154-161
[34]   Reconceptualizing the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Shaping Industry Structure [J].
Lee, Peter .
VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 2019, 72 (04) :1197-1283
[35]   R&D Collaboration with Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights [J].
Czarnitzki, Dirk ;
Hussinger, Katrin ;
Schneider, Cedric .
REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2015, 46 (02) :183-204
[36]   Rewards versus intellectual property rights when commitment is limited [J].
Galasso, Alberto .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2020, 169 :397-411
[37]   R&D Collaboration with Uncertain Intellectual Property Rights [J].
Dirk Czarnitzki ;
Katrin Hussinger ;
Cédric Schneider .
Review of Industrial Organization, 2015, 46 :183-204
[38]   The economic importance and impacts of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in Sudan [J].
Nour, Samia Satti Osman Mohamed .
AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 7 (02) :126-143
[39]   Innovations in intellectual property rights management Their potential benefits and limitations [J].
Modic, Dolores ;
Hafner, Ana ;
Damij, Nadja ;
Zajc, Luka Cehovin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2019, 28 (02) :189-203
[40]   Dynamic competition and intellectual property rights in a model of product development [J].
de Villemeur, Etienne Billette ;
Ruble, Richard ;
Versaevel, Bruno .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2019, 100 :270-296