Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM

被引:60
作者
Bekkers, R
Verspagen, B
Smits, J
机构
[1] Dial Innovatie & Interactie, NL-3581 ND Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, ECIS, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
innovation strategies; patents; telecommunications; GSM; essential IPR;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00007-1
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardization in the telecommunications industry. We take the global system for mobile communications (GSM) case as a highly relevant example, being part of a high-tech industry in which standards play a large role. In the process of designing the GSM standard, a lot of attention has been given to IPRs, mainly to avoid a situation in which a single IPR holder could hamper or even totally block the development of the standard. Nevertheless, the ultimate GSM standard contains a large amount of so-called 'essential IPRs', i.e., IPRs without which the implementation of GSM products is impossible. The paper provides a general discussion of the development of GSM and presents a database on the essential IPRs in the GSM standard. This database has been compiled on the basis of international patent statistics, and the data that manufacturers have supplied to European Telecommunications Standards Institute, the European standardization body responsible for defining the GSM standard. We use this database to assess the dynamic IPR position of firms in the original GSM standard and its subsequent development. We use the GSM case to underline the importance of a general European policy with regard to IPRs and standardization, and derive several concrete recommendations for such a policy. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Nanotechnology applications and intellectual property rights in agriculture [J].
Pritom Chowdhury ;
Madhurjya Gogoi ;
Sangeeta Borchetia ;
Tanoy Bandyopadhyay .
Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2017, 15 :413-419
[22]   Generic definition of standardization and the correlation between innovation and standardization in corporate intellectual property activities [J].
Tamura, Suguru .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2013, 40 (02) :143-156
[23]   Private prosecution of intellectual property rights infringements in Singapore [J].
Mujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira .
QUEEN MARY JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 2019, 9 (04) :484-489
[24]   Intellectual Property Rights and the Ascent of Proprietary Innovation in Agriculture [J].
Clancy, Matthew S. ;
Moschini, GianCarlo .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF RESOURCE ECONOMICS, VOL 9, 2017, 9 :53-74
[25]   Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World: Theory and Practice [J].
Hannabuss, Stuart .
LIBRARY REVIEW, 2006, 55 (05) :326-+
[26]   Who owns the Atoms? Nanotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights [J].
Javier Carrozza, Tomas ;
Silvia Brieva, Susana .
ICONOS, 2015, 19 (52) :163-180
[27]   Observations on a meeting on the ethics of intellectual property rights and patents [J].
Spier, R .
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2005, 11 (01) :151-158
[28]   The convergence between competition law and intellectual property rights [J].
Tassano Velaochaga, Hebert Eduardo .
DERECHO PUCP, 2015, (74) :237-248
[29]   Property Comparison of Intellectual Property Rights of Image-Based on Encryption Techniques [J].
Jabbar, Khalid Kadhim ;
Ghozzi, Fahmi ;
Fakhfakh, Ahmed .
TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2023, 12 (01) :529-539
[30]   Intellectual and Industrial Property Rights in the European Community and Recent Developments [J].
Arikan, Ayse Saadet .
ANKARA AVRUPA CALISMALARI DERGISI-ANKARA REVIEW OF EUROPEAN STUDIES, 2007, 7 (01) :149-173