Intellectual property rights and standardization: the case of GSM

被引:60
|
作者
Bekkers, R
Verspagen, B
Smits, J
机构
[1] Dial Innovatie & Interactie, NL-3581 ND Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, ECIS, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
innovation strategies; patents; telecommunications; GSM; essential IPR;
D O I
10.1016/S0308-5961(02)00007-1
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the role of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in the process of standardization in the telecommunications industry. We take the global system for mobile communications (GSM) case as a highly relevant example, being part of a high-tech industry in which standards play a large role. In the process of designing the GSM standard, a lot of attention has been given to IPRs, mainly to avoid a situation in which a single IPR holder could hamper or even totally block the development of the standard. Nevertheless, the ultimate GSM standard contains a large amount of so-called 'essential IPRs', i.e., IPRs without which the implementation of GSM products is impossible. The paper provides a general discussion of the development of GSM and presents a database on the essential IPRs in the GSM standard. This database has been compiled on the basis of international patent statistics, and the data that manufacturers have supplied to European Telecommunications Standards Institute, the European standardization body responsible for defining the GSM standard. We use this database to assess the dynamic IPR position of firms in the original GSM standard and its subsequent development. We use the GSM case to underline the importance of a general European policy with regard to IPRs and standardization, and derive several concrete recommendations for such a policy. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 188
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] SAUDI EFFORTS TO PROTECT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
    Alghamdi, Hamdan Darwish
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 36 (01): : 154 - 186
  • [12] Knowledge disclosure as intellectual property rights protection
    Ponce, Carlos J.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2011, 80 (03) : 418 - 434
  • [13] Nanotechnology applications and intellectual property rights in agriculture
    Chowdhury, Pritom
    Gogoi, Madhurjya
    Borchetia, Sangeeta
    Bandyopadhyay, Tanoy
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2017, 15 (03) : 413 - 419
  • [14] The value of intellectual property rights to firms and society
    Greenhalgh, Christine
    Rogers, Mark
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2007, 23 (04) : 541 - 567
  • [15] On biodiversity access, intellectual property rights, and conservation
    Bhat, MG
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 29 (03) : 391 - 403
  • [16] Nanotechnology applications and intellectual property rights in agriculture
    Pritom Chowdhury
    Madhurjya Gogoi
    Sangeeta Borchetia
    Tanoy Bandyopadhyay
    Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2017, 15 : 413 - 419
  • [17] Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain
    Breakey, Hugh
    MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2010, 73 (02) : 208 - 239
  • [18] 'Biopiracy' as a challenge to intellectual property rights systems
    Hamilton C.
    Development, 2006, 49 (4) : 94 - 100
  • [19] ENDOGENOUS RECOMBINANT GROWTH AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
    Marchese, Carla
    Marsiglio, Simone
    Privileggi, Fabio
    Ramello, Giovanni B.
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2035 - 2067
  • [20] Intellectual Property Rights for Plants in the United States
    Strachan, Janice M.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 2011, 16 (02): : 84 - 87