Challenges Implementing Qualitative Research Methods in a Study of Instructional Design Practice

被引:2
|
作者
Tomita, Kei [1 ]
Alangari, Husa [2 ]
Zhu, Meina [3 ]
Ergulec, Fatih [4 ]
Lachheb, Ahmed [4 ]
Boling, Elizabeth [4 ]
机构
[1] Kennesaw State Univ, 1100 South Marietta Pkwy DM 9045, Marietta, GA 30060 USA
[2] Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman Univ, Airport Rd,King Khalid Int Airport, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
[3] Wayne State Univ, 365 Educ Bldg,5425 Gullen Mall, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Wendell W Wright Educ Bldg,201 N Rose Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Core judgment; Instructional design; Qualitative research method; Research challenges; INTERVIEW;
D O I
10.1007/s11528-020-00569-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Studies of instructional design (ID) practices do not always highlight the inner workings of the research method and can leave readers without a clear understanding of how the study was actually carried out, particularly if it encompassed some complexity in process. As a team of researchers with different levels of scholarly expertise and knowledge, as well as multicultural backgrounds, we recognized the challenges of research methods we were employing as we studied instructional designers' core judgment - their tacit beliefs and values relevant to their design practice (Nelson and Stolterman 2012). This recognition motivated us to share the nuts and bolts of this recent research study, and we highlight here the practical and conceptual challenges we faced, as well as the strategies we used to overcome those challenges. We share the lessons learned from our challenges and hope the scholarly community may agree that sharing experiences can contribute to improving inquiry practices in the field.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 151
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges Implementing Qualitative Research Methods in a Study of Instructional Design Practice
    Kei Tomita
    Husa Alangari
    Meina Zhu
    Fatih Ergulec
    Ahmed Lachheb
    Elizabeth Boling
    TechTrends, 2021, 65 : 144 - 151
  • [2] Instructional design and instructional effectiveness in virtual classrooms: Research trends and challenges
    Cukurbasi, Baris
    Kiyici, Mubin
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 37 (06) : 156 - 174
  • [3] Implementing CS1 with embedded instructional research design in laboratories
    Lang, J
    Nugent, GC
    Samal, A
    Soh, LK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2006, 49 (01) : 157 - 165
  • [4] Instructional Design as Knowledge Management: A Knowledge-in-Practice Approach to Choosing Instructional Methods
    McIver, Derrick
    Fitzsimmons, Stacey
    Flanagan, David
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2016, 40 (01) : 47 - 75
  • [5] Review of The Instructional Design Knowledge Base: Theory, Research, and Practice
    McMurtry, Kim
    TECHTRENDS, 2014, 58 (03) : 97 - 99
  • [6] How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice
    Williams, David D.
    South, Joseph B.
    Yanchar, Stephen C.
    Wilson, Brent G.
    Allen, Stephanie
    ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 59 (06): : 885 - 907
  • [7] How do instructional designers evaluate? A qualitative study of evaluation in practice
    David D. Williams
    Joseph B. South
    Stephen C. Yanchar
    Brent G. Wilson
    Stephanie Allen
    Educational Technology Research and Development, 2011, 59 : 885 - 907
  • [8] "Hand in Glove": Using Qualitative Methods to Connect Research and Practice
    Harper, Liam D.
    McCunn, Robert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSIOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE, 2017, 12 (07) : 990 - 993
  • [9] IMPLEMENTING AN ELEARNING PROGRAM WITH A DECENTRALIZED INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN TEAM
    Holcomb, James
    Greer, Tomika
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES (EDULEARN17), 2017, : 3764 - 3773
  • [10] Research on Instructional Design of Management
    Guo, Ping
    2011 AASRI CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (AASRI-ITED 2011), VOL 2, 2011, : 31 - 34