The Impact of Student Individual Differences and Visual Attention to Pedagogical Agents During Learning with MetaTutor

被引:8
|
作者
Lalle, Sebastien [1 ]
Taub, Michelle [2 ]
Mudrick, Nicholas V. [2 ]
Conati, Cristina [1 ]
Azevedo, Roger [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION, AIED 2017 | 2017年 / 10331卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Pedagogical agents; Personalization; Visual attention; Achievement goals; Personality traits; Intelligent tutoring systems; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; COGNITIVE LOAD; EYE-TRACKING; TECHNOLOGY; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between students' (N = 28) individual differences and visual attention to pedagogical agents (PAs) during learning with MetaTutor, a hypermedia-based intelligent tutoring systems. We used eye tracking to capture visual attention to the PAs, and our results reveal specific visual attention-related metrics (e.g., fixation rate, longest fixations) that are significantly influenced by learning depending on student achievement goals. Specifically, performance-oriented students learned more with a long longest fixation and a high fixation rate on the PAs, whereas mastery-oriented students learned less with a high fixation rate on the PAs. Our findings contribute to understanding how to design PAs that can better adapt to student achievement goals and visual attention to the PA.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Impact of Individual Differences on Affective Reactions to Pedagogical Agents Scaffolding
    Lalle, Sebastien
    Mudrick, Nicholas V.
    Taub, Michelle
    Grafsgaard, Joseph F.
    Conati, Cristina
    Azevedo, Roger
    INTELLIGENT VIRTUAL AGENTS, IVA 2016, 2016, 10011 : 269 - 282
  • [2] Do pedagogical agents make a difference to student motivation and learning?
    Heidig, Steffi
    Clarebout, Geraldine
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2011, 6 (01) : 27 - 54
  • [3] Individual Differences in the Allocation of Visual Attention During Navigation
    Keller, Mikayla
    Sutton, Jennifer E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2022, 76 (01): : 10 - 21
  • [4] Individual differences in selective attention and engagement shape students' learning from visual cues and instructor presence during online lessons
    King, Jill
    Marcus, Taylor
    Markant, Julie
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [5] Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: Visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning
    Veletsianos, George
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 55 (02) : 576 - 585
  • [6] Learning to focus on students: the effect of pedagogical training on university teachers' visual attention
    Vilppu, Henna
    Anto, E.
    Murtonen, M.
    TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [7] The impact of video lecturers' nonverbal communication on learning - An experiment on gestures and facial expressions of pedagogical agents
    Schneider, Sascha
    Krieglstein, Felix
    Beege, Maik
    Rey, Gunter Daniel
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2022, 176
  • [8] Proneness to psychosis and selection of objects of visual attention: individual differences in visual marking
    Mason, OJ
    Booth, H
    Olivers, C
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 36 (08) : 1771 - 1779
  • [9] Neurophysiological signatures reflect differences in visual attention during absence seizures
    Barone, Valentina
    Piastra, Maria Carla
    van Dijk, Johannes P.
    Visser, Gerhard H.
    Debeij-van Hall, Mariette H. J. A.
    van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 152 : 34 - 42
  • [10] Pedagogical agents as learning companions: the impact of agent emotion and gender
    Kim, Y.
    Baylor, A. L.
    Shen, E.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2007, 23 (03) : 220 - 234