ISO 12189 standard for the preclinical evaluation of posterior spinal stabilization devices - I: Assembly procedure and validation

被引:15
作者
La Barbera, Luigi [1 ,2 ]
Villa, Tomaso [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn Giulio Natta, Lab Biol Struct Mech, Piazza Leonardo Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] IRCCS Ist Ortoped Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
关键词
ISO; 12189; ASTM F1717; 10243; standard; fatigue; axial compression; preclinical evaluation; pedicle screw; spine stabilization; finite element; validation; strain gauges; load sharing; HUMAN LUMBAR SPINE; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; MECHANICAL-BEHAVIOR; FIXATION SYSTEMS; LOADS; STIFFNESS; FUSION; FIXATORS; NUCLEUS;
D O I
10.1177/0954411915621587
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The International Standardization Organization introduced standard 12189 for the preclinical evaluation of the mechanical reliability of posterior stabilization devices. The well-known vertebrectomy model formalized in standard F1717 by the American Society for Testing and Materials was modified with the introduction of a modular anterior support made up of three calibrated springs, which allows to describe a more realistic scenario, closer to the effective clinical use, as well to test even very flexible and dynamic posterior stabilization implants. Despite these important improvements, ISO 12189 received very little attention in the literature. The aim of the work is to provide a systematic procedure for the assembly and validation of a finite element model capable of describing the experimental test according to ISO 12189. The validated finite element model is able to catch very well the effective stiffness of the unassembled and assembled constructs (percentage differences <2% and <10%, respectively). As concern the assembled construct, the experimentally measured and predicted strains were found in a good agreement (R-2>0.75, root mean square error<30%), but the procedure without precompression lead to much better results (R-2>0.96, root mean square error<10%). Given the prediction errors of the assembled construct fall within the experimental range of repeatability, the finite element model can be systematically implemented to support the mechanical design of a variety of spinal implants, to quantitatively investigate the load-sharing mechanism, as well as to investigate the loading conditions set by ISO 12189 standard.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 133
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] The biomechanical significance of anterior column support in a simulated single-level spinal fusion
    Polly, DW
    Klemme, WR
    Cunningham, BW
    Burnette, JB
    Haggerty, CJ
    Oda, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2000, 13 (01): : 58 - 62
  • [32] Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation
    Ponnappan, Ravi K.
    Serhan, Hassan
    Zarda, Brett
    Patel, Ravi
    Albert, Todd
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (03) : 263 - 267
  • [33] Comparative effectiveness of PEEK rods versus titanium alloy rods in lumbar fusion: A preliminary report
    Qi, Lei
    Li, Mu
    Zhang, Shuai
    Xue, Jingsong
    Si, Haipeng
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2013, 155 (07) : 1187 - 1193
  • [34] Quaglini V, 2005, P 19 EUR C BIOM SORR
  • [35] Changes in the loads on an internal spinal fixator after iliac-crest autograft
    Rohlmann, A
    Bergmann, G
    Graichen, F
    Weber, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2000, 82B (03): : 445 - 449
  • [36] Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during physical therapy
    Rohlmann, A
    Graichen, F
    Bergmann, G
    [J]. PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (01): : 44 - 52
  • [37] Influence of load carrying on loads in internal spinal fixators
    Rohlmann, A
    Graichen, F
    Bergmann, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (09) : 1099 - 1104
  • [38] 2000 Volvo Award Winner in Biomechanical Studies -: Monitoring in vivo implant loads with a telemeterized internal spinal fixation device
    Rohlmann, A
    Graichen, F
    Weber, U
    Bergmann, G
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (23) : 2981 - 2986
  • [39] Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system?
    Schmidt, Hendrik
    Heuer, Frank
    Wilke, Hans-Joachim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 42 (01) : 48 - 54
  • [40] SHEA M, 1994, J SPINAL DISORD, V7, P317