Brunnstrom recovery stage and motricity index for the evaluation of upper extremity in stroke: analysis for correlation and responsiveness

被引:80
作者
Safaz, Ismail [1 ]
Yilmaz, Bilge [1 ]
Yasar, Evren [1 ]
Alaca, Ridvan [1 ]
机构
[1] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Turkish Armed Forces Rehabil Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Brunnstrom; motricity index; rehabilitation; stroke; upper extremity; MOTOR; INSTRUMENTS; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0b013e32832a62ad
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to find out first whether Brunnstrom recovery stage (BRS) and motricity index NO were correlated with each other and second to observe whether the two assessment tools were sensitive to changes regarding the rehabilitation outcome. Forty-six stroke patients who were admitted to the Stroke Rehabilitation Unit at our Rehabilitation Centre were recruited. All measurements were made within the first 72 h of admission and on the last day of discharge. A physiotherapist performed all MI evaluations and a physiatrist blind to the results performed all BRS evaluations. Both upper extremity (UE) and hand BRS scores were found to be positively correlated with those of UE-MI; moreover, correlations between the discharge values were stronger than those between the admission values. The responsiveness of both the total scores of the BRS and UE-MI were strong (effect size d=0.97, Wilcoxon Z=5.33, P<0.001 for the UE-BRS; d=0.81, Z=5.09, P<0.001 for the hand BRS; d=0.91, Z=5.45, P<0.001 for the UE-MI). BRS and MI scores were found to be increased on discharge when compared with those of admission and the differences in between were statistically significant (P<0.001). BRS and MI seem to be well correlated and responsive concerning the evaluation of UEs in early stage stroke patients. Being convenient tests, they may easily be applied repetitively for close follow-up during rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 231
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Ang JHY, 2006, INT J REHABIL RES, V29, P357
[2]  
Brunnstrom S, 1966, Phys Ther, V46, P357
[3]   ASSESSING MOTOR IMPAIRMENT AFTER STROKE - A PILOT RELIABILITY STUDY [J].
COLLIN, C ;
WADE, D .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1990, 53 (07) :576-579
[4]   Evidence-based rating of upper-extremity motor function tests used for people following a stroke [J].
Croarkin, E ;
Danoff, J ;
Barnes, C .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2004, 84 (01) :62-74
[5]   MOTOR EVALUATION IN VASCULAR HEMIPLEGIA [J].
DEMEURISSE, G ;
DEMOL, O ;
ROBAYE, E .
EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 1980, 19 (06) :382-389
[6]  
FEYS H, 2005, PHYSIOTHER RES INT, V5, P1
[7]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[8]   Inter-rater reliability and validity of the Action Research arm test in stroke patients [J].
Hsieh, CL ;
Hsueh, IP ;
Chiang, FM ;
Lin, PH .
AGE AND AGEING, 1998, 27 (02) :107-114
[9]   Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation [J].
Hsueh, IP ;
Hsieh, CL .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 16 (06) :617-624
[10]  
Parker V M, 1986, Int Rehabil Med, V8, P69