Evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning: A comparison using meta-analysis

被引:50
作者
Allen, M [1 ]
Mabry, E
Mattrey, M
Bourhis, J
Titsworth, S
Burrell, N
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Commun, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Commun, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] SW Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO 65802 USA
[4] Ohio Univ, Athens, OH 45701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/joc/54.3.402
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article uses meta-analysis to summarize the quantitative literature comparing the performance of students in distance education versus traditional classes. The average effect (average r=.048, k=39, N=71,731) demonstrates that distance education course students slightly outperformed traditional students on exams and course grades. The average effect was heterogeneous, and the examination of several moderating features (presence or absence of simultaneous interaction, type of channel used in distance education, and course substance) failed to produce a homogeneous solution. The results demonstrate, however, no clear decline in educational effectiveness when using distance education technology.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 420
页数:19
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [61] LAROSE R, 1998, J COMPUTER MEDIATED, V4
  • [62] LIEVROUW LA, 1990, INFORMATION BEHAV, V3, P37
  • [63] MABRY EA, 2002, NEW DIRECTIONS GROUP, P285
  • [64] MAUSHAK N, 1997, ENCY DISTANCE ED RES, P221
  • [65] MCCLEARY ID, 1989, AM J DISTANCE ED, V3, P50
  • [66] COMMUNICATING AT A DISTANCE - A STUDY OF INTERACTION IN A DISTANCE EDUCATION CLASSROOM
    MCHENRY, L
    BOZIK, M
    [J]. COMMUNICATION EDUCATION, 1995, 44 (04) : 362 - 371
  • [67] McIsaac M., 1990, RES DISTANCE ED, V37, P12
  • [68] McLuhan M., 1964, UNDERST MEDIA
  • [69] MERISOTIS JP, 1999, CHANGE MAY, P13
  • [70] MILLER J, 1993, EDUC TECHNOL, V13, P51