Geographic variation in predictors of ED admission rates in US Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries

被引:13
|
作者
Shoff, Carla [1 ]
Caines, Kadin [1 ,2 ]
Pines, Jesse M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Medicare & Medicaid Serv, Baltimore, MD 21244 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Rockville, MD USA
[3] USACS, Canton, OH USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2019年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Emergency department; Spatial; Geographic variation; GWR; Admission; Medicare; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; LEVEL VARIATION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2018.08.060
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: We study community-level factors associated with emergency department (ED) admission rates and assessed how they vary across geography. Methods: We conducted an ecological study using 2012 data from 100% of US. Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries to calculate county-level ED admission rates, adjusted by Hierarchical Condition Categories to control for patient health. We tested community-level measures related to healthcare market concentration, healthcare delivery, and socioeconomic factors potentially associated with admission rates and assessed whether these factors predicted ED admission rates across counties using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression and whether they varied across geography using geographically weighted regression (GWR). Results: In 3031 US. counties, the ED admission rate varied from 3.9% to 82.2%. The lowest ED admission rates were concentrated in counties in Kansas, Oregon, and Vermont and the highest ED admission rates were in counties throughout Washington, Wyoming, Texas, and Colorado. The OLS model found several community-level factors that negatively impacted admission rates, specifically hospital market concentration, the rate of hospital beds with urgent care, and the rate of hospital beds. The factors that had a positive impact on the admission rate include the rate of MDs and factors for disadvantage, affluence, and foreign born/Hispanic. However, GWR showed the relationship between the ED admission rate and predictors varied across US. counties Conclusions: The association between healthcare market concentration, healthcare delivery, and socioeconomic factors with ED admissions differed across communities in Medicare beneficiaries. This suggests that policy and interventions to reduce ED admissions need to be tailored to specific community contexts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1078 / 1084
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patterns of national emergency department utilization by fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with dementia
    Bowman, Jason K.
    Ritchie, Christine S.
    Ouchi, Kei
    Tulsky, James A.
    Teno, Joan M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2024, 72 (10) : 3140 - 3148
  • [22] ARE HOSPITAL INPATIENT COSTS LOWER FOR MEDICARE ADVANTAGE ENROLLEES THAN MEDICARE FEE-FOR-SERVICE BENEFICIARIES?
    Karaca, Z.
    Wong, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A19 - A19
  • [23] Transgender Medicare Beneficiaries and Chronic Conditions: Exploring Fee-for-Service Claims Data
    Dragon, Christina N.
    Guerino, Paul
    Ewald, Erin
    Laffan, Alison M.
    LGBT HEALTH, 2017, 4 (06) : 404 - 411
  • [24] Inequity in Adoption of Advanced Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Fee-for-service Beneficiaries
    Wherry, Kael
    Zhu, Cyrus
    Vigersky, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2022, 107 (05): : E2177 - E2185
  • [25] Differences in setting of initial dementia diagnosis among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries
    White, Elizabeth M.
    Bayer, Thomas
    Kosar, Cyrus M.
    Santostefano, Christopher M.
    Muench, Ulrike
    Oh, Hyesung
    Gadbois, Emily A.
    Gozalo, Pedro L.
    Rahman, Momotazur
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2025, 73 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [26] The prevalence of major depression or dysthymia among aged Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries
    McCall, NT
    Parks, P
    Smith, K
    Pope, G
    Griggs, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 17 (06) : 557 - 565
  • [27] Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-For-Service Medicare
    Newhouse, Joseph P.
    POPULATION HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2016, 19 : S4 - S5
  • [28] Trends In 30-Day Readmission Rates In Fee-For-Service Medicare Beneficiaries With COPD: 2001-2009
    Singh, G.
    Zhang, W.
    Kuo, Y. -F.
    Sharma, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 189
  • [29] Geographic Variation in Prevalence of Osteoporosis Diagnosis and Utilization of Anti-Osteoporosis Therapies in United States Female Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with Fragility Fractures
    Lewiecki, E. Michael
    Singer, Andrea J.
    Rane, Pallavi B.
    Shah, Anne
    Petrilla, Allison
    Norris, Kris
    McDermott, Michele
    Gandra, Shravanthi R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2020, 35 : 247 - 248
  • [30] Comparing Medicare Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries with ESKD who Switched to Medicare Advantage versus Remained in Traditional Medicare
    Gao, Allan Y.
    Knapp, Christopher D.
    Liu, Jiannong
    Johansen, Kirsten L.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 19 (09): : 1183 - 1190