Clinically Useful Diagnostic Tool of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography for Focal Liver Masses: Comparison to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:29
作者
Ryu, Sung Woo [1 ]
Bok, Gene Hyun [1 ]
Jang, Jae Young [1 ]
Jeong, Soung Won [1 ]
Ham, Nam Seok [1 ]
Kim, Ji Hye [1 ]
Park, Eui Ju [1 ]
Kim, Jin Nyoung [1 ]
Lee, Woong Cheul [1 ]
Shim, Kwang Yeun [1 ]
Lee, Sae Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Sang Gyune [1 ]
Cha, Sang-Woo [1 ]
Kim, Young Seok [1 ]
Cho, Young Deok [1 ]
Kim, Hong Soo [1 ]
Kim, Boo Sung [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Ctr Digest Dis,Inst Digest Res,Dept Internal Med, Seoul 140743, South Korea
关键词
Contrast enhanced ultrasonography; Liver masses; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ULTRASOUND; LESIONS; SONOGRAPHY; CT; BENIGN;
D O I
10.5009/gnl.2014.8.3.292
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast (SonoVue) enhancement ultrasonography (CEUS) and to compare this method with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating liver masses. Methods: CEUS (n=50), CT (n=47), and MRI (n=43) were performed on 50 liver masses in 48 patients for baseline mass characterization. The most likely impression for each modality and the final diagnosis, based on the combined biopsy results (n=14), angiography findings (n=36), and clinical course, were determined. The diagnostic value of CEUS was compared to those of CT and MRI. Results: The final diagnosis of the masses was hepatocellular carcinoma (n=43), hemangioma (n=3), benign adenoma (n=2), eosinophilic abscess (n=1), and liver metastasis (n=1). The overall diagnostic agreement with the final diagnosis was substantial for CEUS, CT, and MRI, with K values of 0.621, 0.763, and 0.784, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 87.5%, and 84.0%, respectively, for CEUS; 95.0%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively, for CT; and 94.6%, 83.3%, and 93.0%, respectively for MRI. After excluding the lesions with poor acoustic sonographic windows, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CEUS were 94.6%, 87.5%, and 93.3%, respectively, with a K value of 0.765. Conclusions: If an appropriate acoustic window is available, CEUS is comparable to CT and MRI for the diagnosis of liver masses.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 297
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] New perspectives for the use of contrast-enhanced liver ultrasound in clinical practice
    Bolondi, L.
    Correas, J. M.
    Lencioni, R.
    Weskott, H. P.
    Piscaglia, F.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (02) : 187 - 195
  • [2] Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Update
    Bruix, Jordi
    Sherman, Morris
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 53 (03) : 1020 - 1022
  • [3] European Assoc Study Liver, 2012, EUR J CANCER, V48, P599, DOI [10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001, 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.021]
  • [4] Current consensus and guidelines of contrast enhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions
    Jang, Jae Young
    Kim, Moon Young
    Jeong, Soung Won
    Kim, Tae Yeob
    Kim, Seung Up
    Lee, Sae Hwan
    Suk, Ki Tae
    Park, Soo Young
    Woo, Hyun Young
    Kim, Sang Gyune
    Heo, Jeong
    Baik, Soon Koo
    Kim, Hong Soo
    Tak, Won Young
    [J]. CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 19 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [5] Hepatocellular nodules in liver cirrhosis: contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Lee, Kyoung Ho
    Khalili, Korosh
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2011, 36 (03): : 244 - 263
  • [6] Martie A, 2011, MED ULTRASON, V13, P108
  • [7] Ultrasonography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Toward Improved Treatment Decisions
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imai, Yasuharu
    Okada, Masahiro
    Hyodo, Tomoko
    Lee, Won-Jae
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Kim, Tonsok
    Choi, Byung Ihn
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2011, 81 : 86 - 99
  • [8] Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions
    Nicolau, C
    Vilana, R
    Catalá, V
    Bianchi, L
    Gilabert, R
    García, A
    Brú, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (01) : 158 - 167
  • [9] The safety of Sonovue® in abdominal applications:: Retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    Bolondi, Luigi
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 32 (09) : 1369 - 1375
  • [10] Romanini Laura, 2007, Eur Radiol, V17 Suppl 6, pF99