Influence of Recycled Asphalt Pavement on Interfacial Energy and Bond Strength of Asphalt Binder for Different Types of Aggregates

被引:36
作者
Habal, Ayyanna [1 ]
Singh, Dharamveer [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
关键词
SURFACE FREE-ENERGY; MOISTURE SENSITIVITY; SUSCEPTIBILITY; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0361198118784377
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The bond between aggregate and asphalt binder depends on many factors, such as chemistry of materials, nature of aggregates, and quality of asphalt binder. The present study evaluates the effects of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) on the bonding behavior of asphalt binder for acidic (granite and quartzite) and basic (basalt and limestone) aggregates. AC30 binder was blended with different proportions of RAP binder (15%, 25%, and 40%). The interfacial energy and bond strength of 16 combinations (four asphalt binders x four aggregates) of aggregate-asphalt binder system were evaluated based on a surface free energy (SFE) approach and binder bond strength (BBS) test, respectively. One of the strong motivations of the present study was to evaluate how interfacial energy parameters calculated based on the SFE of an aggregate-asphalt binder system may correlate with the outcome obtained from a BBS test. The results showed that AC30 binder modified with RAP binder had a good performance for basic aggregates compared with acidic aggregates. Basic aggregates (limestone and basalt) showed cohesive failure before and after conditioning, indicating minimal effects of water on interfacial bond strength. However, acidic aggregates (granite and quartzite) showed cohesive failure in dry conditions and adhesive failure after wet conditioning, implying detrimental effects of water on interfacial bond strength for these aggregates. The failure pattern of aggregates in cohesion was supported by a reduction in cohesion energy of asphalt binder after the addition of RAP binder. Correlation between interfacial energy parameters (obtained from SFE) and BBS strength depends on aggregate types and failure patterns.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 166
页数:13
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Aashto (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2016, T361 AASHTO
[2]   Effect of Aging on Adhesion Properties of Asphalt Mixtures with the Use of Bitumen Bond Strength and Surface Energy Measurement Tests [J].
Aguiar-Moya, Jose P. ;
Salazar-Delgado, Jorge ;
Baldi-Sevilla, Alejandra ;
Leiva-Villacorta, Fabricio ;
Loria-Salazar, Luis .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2015, (2505) :57-65
[3]  
[Anonymous], CULTURE GLOBALIZATIO
[4]   Estimating Moisture Sensitivity of Warm Mix Asphalt Modified with Zycosoil as an Antistrip Agent Using Surface Free Energy Method [J].
Arabani, M. ;
Roshani, H. ;
Hamedi, Gh. H. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2012, 24 (07) :889-897
[5]  
Bahia H., 2012, P 5 EUR EUR C 13 15
[6]   Surface free energy to identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes [J].
Bhasin, Amit ;
Little, Dallas N. ;
Vasconcelos, Kamilla L. ;
Masad, Eyad .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, 2001 (2001) :37-45
[7]   Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes containing RAP and different types of aggregates and asphalt binders using the surface free energy method [J].
Ghabchi, Rouzbeh ;
Singh, Dharamveer ;
Zaman, Musharraf .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2014, 73 :479-489
[8]   Moisture Damage Resistance of GTR-Modified Asphalt Binders Containing WMA Additives Using the Surface Free Energy Approach [J].
Habal, Ayyanna ;
Singh, Dharamveer .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2017, 31 (03)
[9]   Comparison of Wilhelmy plate and Sessile drop methods to rank moisture damage susceptibility of asphalt - Aggregates combinations [J].
Habal, Ayyanna ;
Singh, Dharamveer .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2016, 113 :351-358
[10]   Using energy parameters based on the surface free energy concept to evaluate the moisture susceptibility of hot mix asphalt [J].
Hamedi, Gholam Hossein ;
Moghadas Nejad, Fereidoon .
ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2015, 16 (02) :239-255