A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing high flow therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for preterm infants with respiratory distress (the HIPSTER trial): study protocol

被引:20
|
作者
Roberts, Calum T. [1 ,2 ]
Owen, Louise S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Manley, Brett J. [1 ,2 ]
Donath, Susan M. [3 ,4 ]
Davis, Peter G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Womens Hosp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2015年 / 5卷 / 06期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
CANNULAE; CPAP; NURSERIES; DEVICE; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008483
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: High flow (HF) therapy is an increasingly popular mode of non-invasive respiratory support for preterm infants. While there is now evidence to support the use of HF to reduce extubation failure, there have been no appropriately designed and powered studies to assess the use of HF as primary respiratory support soon after birth. Our hypothesis is that HF is non-inferior to the standard treatment-nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)as primary respiratory support for preterm infants. Methods and analysis: The HIPSTER trial is an unblinded, international, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Eligible infants are preterm infants of 28-36(+6) weeks' gestational age (GA) who require primary non-invasive respiratory support for respiratory distress in the first 24 h of life. Infants are randomised to treatment with either HF or NCPAP. The primary outcome is treatment failure within 72 h after randomisation, as determined by objective oxygenation, blood gas, and apnoea criteria, or the need for urgent intubation and mechanical ventilation. Secondary outcomes include the incidence of intubation, pneumothorax, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, nasal trauma, costs associated with hospital care and parental stress. With a specified non-inferiority margin of 10%, using a two-sided 95% CI and 90% power, the study requires 375 infants per group (total 750 infants). Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been granted by the relevant human research ethics committees at The Royal Women's Hospital (13/12), The Royal Children's Hospital (33144A), The Mercy Hospital for Women (R13/34), and the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (2013/1657). The trial is currently recruiting at 9 centres in Australia and Norway. The trial results will be published in peer-reviewed international journals, and presented at national and international conferences.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol
    Manley, Brett J.
    Roberts, Calum T.
    Arnolda, Gaston R. B.
    Wright, Ian M. R.
    Owen, Louise S.
    Dalziel, Kim M.
    Foster, Jann P.
    Davis, Peter G.
    Buckmaster, Adam G.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (06):
  • [2] Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as an Initial Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: a Randomized, Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
    Shin, Jeonghee
    Park, Kyuhee
    Lee, Eun Hee
    Choi, Byung Min
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 32 (04) : 650 - 655
  • [3] High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Primary Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Murki, Srinivas
    Singh, Jayesh
    Khant, Chiragkumar
    Dash, Swarup Kumar
    Oleti, Tejo Pratap
    Joy, Percy
    Kabra, Nandkishor S.
    NEONATOLOGY, 2018, 113 (03) : 235 - 241
  • [4] A multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal continuous positive airway pressure with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary support before minimally invasive surfactant administration for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (the NIV-MISA-RDS trial): Study protocol
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Jun
    Zeng, Lin
    Gao, Yajuan
    Zhao, Wanjun
    Han, Tongyan
    Tong, Xiaomei
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [5] Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in extremely preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled, superiority trial
    Li, Yang
    Zhu, Xingwang
    Shi, Yuan
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [6] Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure
    Tang, Jessica
    Reid, Shelley
    Lutz, Tracey
    Malcolm, Girvan
    Oliver, Sue
    Osborn, David Andrew
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2015, 15
  • [7] Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure
    Jessica Tang
    Shelley Reid
    Tracey Lutz
    Girvan Malcolm
    Sue Oliver
    David Andrew Osborn
    BMC Pediatrics, 15
  • [8] Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary mode of respiratory support for respiratory distress in preterm infants
    Deeparaj Hegde
    Jayashree Mondkar
    Harshad Panchal
    Swati Manerkar
    Bonny Jasani
    Nandkishor Kabra
    Indian Pediatrics, 2016, 53 : 129 - 133
  • [9] Heated Humidified High Flow Nasal Cannula versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure as Primary Mode of Respiratory Support for Respiratory Distress in Preterm Infants
    Hegde, Deeparaj
    Mondkar, Jayashree
    Panchal, Harshad
    Manerkar, Swati
    Jasani, Bonny
    Kabra, Nandkishor
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2016, 53 (02) : 129 - 133
  • [10] Nasal mask versus nasal prongs for delivering nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress: A randomized controlled trial
    Goel, Sorabh
    Mondkar, Jayashree
    Panchal, Harshad
    Hegde, Deeparaj
    Utture, Alpana
    Manerkar, Swati
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 52 (12) : 1035 - 1040