Drivers of biomass co-firing in US coal-fired power plants

被引:35
|
作者
Goerndt, Michael E. [1 ]
Aguilar, Francisco X. [1 ]
Skog, Kenneth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Forest Prod Lab, Madison, WI 53726 USA
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2013年 / 58卷
关键词
Co-generation facilities; Coal-fired power plant; Internal factor; Environmental regulation; Operational costs; WOODY BIOMASS; ENERGY FEEDSTOCK; FLUIDIZED-BED; COCOMBUSTION; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.09.012
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Substantial knowledge has been generated in the U.S. about the resource base for forest-and other residue-derived biomass for bioenergy including co-firing in power plants. However, a lack of understanding regarding power plant-level operations and manager perceptions of drivers of biomass co-firing remains. This study gathered information from U.S. power plant managers to identify drivers behind co-firing, determine key conditions influencing past and current use, and explore future prospects for biomass in co-firing. Most of the biomass used in co-firing was woody biomass procured within 100 km of a power plant. Results show that the most influential co-firing drivers included: adequate biomass supply, competitive cost of biomass compared to fossil fuels, and costs of biomass transport. Environmental regulations were generally considered second-most influential in decisions to test or co-fire with biomass, but were of high importance to managers of plants that are currently not co-firing but may in the future. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 167
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomass co-firing for coal-fired boilers
    Demirbas, A
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2003, 21 (03) : 269 - 278
  • [2] Co-firing of biomass in coal-fired utility boilers
    Savolainen, K
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2003, 74 (3-4) : 369 - 381
  • [3] A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants
    Roni, Md S.
    Eksioglu, Sandra D.
    Searcy, Erin
    Jha, Krishna
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 61 : 115 - 134
  • [4] Development and application of a decision support tool for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power plants
    Smith, Jason S.
    Safferman, Steven I.
    Saffron, Christopher M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 236
  • [5] Environmental and socio-economic implications of woody biomass co-firing at coal-fired power plants
    Picciano, Paul
    Aguilar, Francisco X.
    Burtraw, Dallas
    Mirzaee, Ashkan
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 68
  • [6] Optimization models to integrate production and transportation planning for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants
    Eksioglu, Sandra Duni
    Karimi, Hadi
    Eksioglu, Burak
    IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 48 (10) : 901 - 920
  • [7] Biomass co-firing options on the emission reduction and electricity generation costs in coal-fired power plants
    Basu, Prabir
    Butler, James
    Leon, Mathias A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (01) : 282 - 288
  • [8] Technical and Environmental Feasibility of Co-firing Torrefied Biomass in a Coal-fired Power Plant
    Devaraja, U. M. A.
    Supunsala, S. D. S.
    Gunarathne, Duleeka Sandamali
    MERCON 2020: 6TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON), 2020, : 499 - 504
  • [9] Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
    Dumitru Cebrucean
    Viorica Cebrucean
    Ioana Ionel
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2020, 22 : 153 - 169
  • [10] Modeling and performance analysis of subcritical and supercritical coal-fired power plants with biomass co-firing and CO2 capture
    Cebrucean, Dumitru
    Cebrucean, Viorica
    Ionel, Ioana
    CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (01) : 153 - 169