Target, distance, and valence: Unpacking the effects of normative feedback

被引:10
作者
Bogard, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Delmas, Magali A. [1 ,2 ]
Goldstein, Noah J. [1 ]
Vezich, I. Stephanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Environm & Sustainabil, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Energy conservation; Normative influences; Social comparison feedback; Residential energy use; Healthy behaviors; ENERGY-CONSERVATION; SOCIAL-INFLUENCE; BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS; INFORMATION STRATEGIES; FIELD EXPERIMENT; STRETCH GOALS; NORMS; BELIEFS; POWER; ME;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
People constantly receive information about their performance relative to others. Estimating these effects is complicated because, as we show, normative feedback includes several dimensions: Target (e.g., a reference group of average versus exemplary performers), Distance (e.g., being near versus far from a benchmark), and Valence (e.g., being better or worse than the benchmark). In Study 1, we randomly assign households to receive no feedback or feedback comparing their energy consumption to either their average or most efficient neighbors. Households compared to average neighbors decreased electricity usage by 6%, but those compared to efficient neighbors increased consumption by 4%. We decompose these effects into the separate influences of Target, Distance, and Valence. In Studies 2 and 3a-c, we randomly assign normative feedback to isolate the independent effects of Distance and Valence. Additionally, we find evidence for the mediating effect of motivation: The more dispiriting the feedback, the worse the subsequent performance.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 73
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [11] Information strategies for energy conservation: A field experiment in India
    Chen, Victor L.
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Locke, Stephen L.
    Singh, Amarjeet
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 : 215 - 227
  • [12] What can we learn from high-frequency appliance-level energy metering? Results from a field experiment
    Chen, Victor L.
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Kaiser, William J.
    Locke, Stephen L.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 77 : 164 - 175
  • [13] Cialdini R. B., 1991, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V24, P201, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
  • [14] Social influence: Compliance and conformity
    Cialdini, RB
    Goldstein, NJ
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 55 : 591 - 621
  • [15] Saving power to conserve your reputation? The effectiveness of private versus public information
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Lessem, Neil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 67 (03) : 353 - 370
  • [16] Information strategies and energy conservation behavior: A meta-analysis of experimental studies from 1975 to 2012
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Fischlein, Miriam
    Asensio, Omar I.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 61 : 729 - 739
  • [17] A THEORY OF SOCIAL COMPARISON PROCESSES
    Festinger, Leon
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 1954, 7 (02) : 117 - 140
  • [18] Bridging the Energy Efficiency Gap: Policy Insights from Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence
    Gillingham, Kenneth
    Palmer, Karen
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2014, 8 (01) : 18 - 38
  • [19] Descriptive normative beliefs and conservation behavior: The moderating roles of personal involvement and injunctive normative beliefs
    Goeckeritz, Susanne
    Schultz, P. Wesley
    Rendon, Tania
    Cialdini, Robert B.
    Goldstein, Noah J.
    Griskevicius, Vladas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) : 514 - 523
  • [20] A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels
    Goldstein, Noah J.
    Cialdini, Robert B.
    Griskevicius, Vladas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (03) : 472 - 482