Validation of the olfactory disorders questionnaire for English-speaking patients with olfactory disorders

被引:44
作者
Langstaff, Lorna [1 ]
Pradhan, Nisha [2 ]
Clark, Allan [3 ]
Boak, Duncan [4 ]
Salam, Mahmoud [5 ]
Hummel, Thomas [6 ]
Philpott, Carl M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] James Paget Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Norfolk Smell & Taste Clin, Gorleston NR31 6LA, Norfolk, England
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Anschutz Med Campus, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Univ East Anglia, Norwich Med Sch, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[4] Fifth Sense, Chinnor, England
[5] Ipswich Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Ipswich, Suffolk, England
[6] Univ Dresden, Med Sch, Smell & Taste Clin, Dresden, Germany
关键词
anosmia; language; Nasal; odour; olfaction; quality of life; reliability; smell; taste; ODOR DISCRIMINATION; DYSFUNCTION; IDENTIFICATION; IMPAIRMENT; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1111/coa.13351
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives To adapt the existing German language olfactory disorders questionnaire for use with English-speaking patients. To validate the adapted version for routine clinical use. Design The translated version of the original German questionnaire was revised with a patient and a clinician to reflect British language and culture. Patients attending an olfactory dysfunction clinic were recruited to perform the adapted questionnaire on two occasions at least 1 month apart. Additional online participants completed the questionnaire via the charity Fifth Sense. Main outcome measures Retest reliability of the English olfactory disorders questionnaire (eODQ) in affected patients including potential for redundancy in any of the included questions. Correlation of eODQ scores with Sniffin' Sticks scores. Results Eighty-seven patients reporting olfactory dysfunction were recruited and had a mean age of 48 with 35% of them being male; 50 datasets were available for analysis. A total of 957 members of the charity entered responses into the online questionnaire; 699 responses could be scored with participants' mean age of 55 years and with 69% reporting as female. The eODQ score and Sniffin' Sticks threshold, discrimination and identification score at timepoint 1 were correlated to assess for concurrent validity, (r = -0.15, P = 0.17) and showed no significant correlation. Female participants had a significantly higher mean total eODQ score than men, 55.75 compared to 52.28 (P = 0.001). The average score was 54.7 (SD 13.5) with a range from 26 to 87. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was good with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90 (confidence intervals 0.89, 0.91). Conclusions The results of this study support the use of the eODQ in a native English-speaking population and highlight the different distinctions between "objective" testing of olfaction with the Sniffin' Sticks test, and the patient reported impact of olfactory dysfunction on daily life. These two types of assessment can be easily administered in an outpatient setting and used in the assessment and management of olfactory dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 728
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Brämerson A, 2004, LARYNGOSCOPE, V114, P733
  • [2] Gender differences in health-related quality-of-life are partly explained by sociodemographic and socioeconomic variation between adult men and women in the US: evidence from four US nationally representative data sets
    Cherepanov, Dasha
    Palta, Mari
    Fryback, Dennis G.
    Robert, Stephanie A.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (08) : 1115 - 1124
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders
    Choi, Woo Ri
    Jeong, Hyeon-Yeong
    Kim, Ji Heui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2018, 8 (12) : 1481 - 1485
  • [4] Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life-An Updated Review
    Croy, Ilona
    Nordin, Steven
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. CHEMICAL SENSES, 2014, 39 (03) : 185 - 194
  • [5] Individual significance of olfaction: development of a questionnaire
    Croy, Ilona
    Buschhueter, Dorothee
    Seo, Han-Seok
    Negoias, Simona
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (01) : 67 - 71
  • [6] Damm M, 2004, HNO, V52, P112, DOI 10.1007/s00106-003-0877-z
  • [7] Olfactory dysfunction and daily life
    Frasnelli, J
    Hummel, T
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 262 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [8] Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing
    Gudziol, Volker
    Loetsch, Joern
    Haehner, Antje
    Zahnert, Thomas
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (10) : 1858 - 1863
  • [9] Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks
    Hedner, Margareta
    Larsson, Maria
    Arnold, Nancy
    Zucco, Gesualdo M.
    Hummel, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 32 (10) : 1062 - 1067
  • [10] Hummel T, 2017, RHINOLOGY, V54, P7, DOI 10.4193/Rhino16.248