Expression and clinical significance of HOXA5, E-cadherin, and β-catenin in cervical squamous cell carcinoma

被引:0
作者
Pei, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhi-Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Jian [1 ]
Yang, Yu-Zhong [1 ]
Tian, Jia [1 ]
He, Xuan [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jing [1 ]
Hou, Qiao-Yan [1 ]
Mo, Wen-Fa [1 ]
Zhao, Hai-Lu [2 ]
Zhou, Ying-Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Pathol, 109 Huan Cheng North 2nd Rd, Guilin 541004, Peoples R China
[2] Guilin Med Univ, Guilin, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY | 2018年 / 11卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
HOXA5; E-cadherin; beta-catenin; cervical squamous cell carcinoma; HOMEOBOX GENES; HOMEOTIC GENES; CANCER; METHYLATION; LOCI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: HOXA5 has been identified as a biomarker in pathogenesis of several cancers, such as nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer cells. The role has not been explored in cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Methods: Tissues of 120 cases with CSCC and 30 controls with chronic cervicitis were constructed from our archived surgical pathology files and staining with HOXA5. Additional antibodies to E-cadherin and beta-catenin were stained for comparison. For each marker, low expression was defined as staining score 0 to 3 points, whereas high expression referred to 4 points and above. Fifty-four patients in this research with cervical cancer were followed up for prognostic assessment. Result: HOXA5 had high expression in chronic cervicitis and low in CSCC (P=0.004). The positivity rates of HOXA5 in patients without muscular layer invasion (MLI) and lymphatic invasion (LI) was higher than that in metastasis (113 vs. 17; 117 vs. 3). Consistently, low expression of HOXA5 was more common in poorly differentiated carcinoma, CSCC subjects without MLI and LI. Expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin was parallel with the expression of HOXA5. Additionally, patients with higher expression of HOXA5 had much more favorable prognosis than those with lower expression among follow up of the 54 patients. Conclusion: In parallel with E-cadherin and beta-catenin, low expression of HOXA5 was more common in CSCC patients with poor differentiation, without MLI and LI, among those which showed poor prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:3091 / 3096
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Abe M, 2006, ONCOL REP, V15, P797
  • [2] Hox regulation of normal and leukemic hematopoietic stem cells
    Abramovich, Carolina
    Humphries, R. Keith
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2005, 12 (03) : 210 - 216
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, F1000 RES
  • [4] Clinical significance of promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A, RARβ2, BRCA1 and HOXA5 in breast cancers of Indian patients
    Bagadi, Sarangadhara Appala Raju
    Prasad, Chandra Prakash
    Kaur, Jatinder
    Srivastava, Anurag
    Prashad, Rajinder
    Gupta, Siddartha Datta
    Ralhan, Ranju
    [J]. LIFE SCIENCES, 2008, 82 (25-26) : 1288 - 1292
  • [5] Homeobox D10 induces phenotypic reversion of breast tumor cells in a three-dimensional culture model
    Carrio, M
    Arderiu, G
    Myers, C
    Boudreau, NJ
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 65 (16) : 7177 - 7185
  • [6] Coupling assembly of the E-cadherin/β-catenin complex to efficient endoplasmic reticulum exit and basal-lateral membrane targeting of E-cadherin in polarized MDCK cells
    Chen, YT
    Stewart, DB
    Nelson, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1999, 144 (04) : 687 - 699
  • [7] Homeobox genes in normal and malignant cells
    Cillo, C
    Cantile, M
    Faiella, A
    Boncinelli, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 188 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [8] The Pbx Interaction Motif of Hoxa1 Is Essential for Its Oncogenic Activity
    Delval, Stephanie
    Taminiau, Arnaud
    Lamy, Juliette
    Lallemand, Cecile
    Gilles, Christine
    Noel, Agnes
    Rezsohazy, Rene
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09):
  • [9] FIGO Cancer Report 2015
    Denny, Lynette
    Quinn, Michael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 131 : S75 - S75
  • [10] Homeobox genes: A link between development, cell cycle, and cancer?
    Ford, HL
    [J]. CELL BIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 22 (06) : 397 - 400