Pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy of high risk prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
Berkut, M., V [1 ]
Artemjeva, A. S. [2 ]
Tolmachev, S. S. [2 ]
Reva, S. A. [1 ,3 ]
Petrov, S., V [1 ,3 ]
Nosov, A. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth Russia, NN Petrov Natl Med Res Ctr Oncol, Dept Oncourol, 68 Leningradskaya St, St Petersburg 197758, Russia
[2] Minist Hlth Russia, NN Petrov Natl Med Res Ctr Oncol, Dept Pathomorphol, 68 Leningradskaya St, St Petersburg 197758, Russia
[3] Pavlov First St Petersburg State Med Univ, Minist Hlth Russia, Urooncol Dept, 17-54 Lva Tolstogo St, St Petersburg 197022, Russia
来源
ONKOUROLOGIYA | 2020年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; neoadjuvant therapy; chemotherapy; hormone therapy; pathologic response; tumor response; RADIOTHERAPY; MORTALITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.17650/1726-9776-2020-16-3-80-89
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. The role of pathological response, which develops as a result of systemic therapy for localized and locally advanced high risk prostate cancer, is not stillfully understood. Mere are no clear indications for neoadjuvant therapy and no data on the relationship between neoadjuvant thempy and median of overall or progression free survival. According to increasing interest for neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy, we evaluated the features of pathological response and its effects on overall and progression free survival rates. Objective. Estimating residual disease and pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy of high risk prostate cancer and its relationship with ontological results. Materials and methods. This was a prospective randomized study: patients with prostate cancer of high and very high-risk groups (prostate specific antigen levels >20 ng/ml and/or Gleason score >= 8 and/or clinical stage >T2c) were treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by radical prostatectomy (n = 36). The neoadjuvant course included the intravenous administration of docetaxel once every 21 days (75 mg/m(2) up to 6 cycles) and the antagonist of the gonadotropin releasing hormone degarelix according to the standard scheme (6 subcutaneous injections every 28 days). The prostate tissue was evaluated for the residual disease, features of pathological response according to the ABC system. Additionally, the expression of IHC markers (p53, bcl-2, p16, Ki-67, androgen receptors, c-MYC, ERG, PTEN) was evaluated on postoperative material using tissue microarray. Results. A totally of 480 H&E postoperative and 775 H&E biopsy slides were analyzed. Group A included 10 (32.3 %) cases, group B - 16 (51.6 %), and group C - 5 (16.1 %). The variance analysis revealed a significant difference in the frequency of more localized forms of prostate cancer in group B (43.7 %) (p = 0.028). During assessment we did not found any relationship ABC system assignment and preoperative prostate specific antigen level, the presence of a positive surgical margin, the pathological stage of diseases or regional lymph nodes involvement. However, the values of relapse-free survival vary sharply between groups: the highest median ofrelapse-free survival was found in group B - 23.02 +/- 12.61 months, patients of groups A/C could not achieve the level of median relapse-free survival - 11.7 +/- 6.43 and 16.19 +/- 16.54 months respectively. Conclusion. The effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy for high risk prostate cancer can be assessed by the features of pathologic response through ABC system which has demonstrated own versatility and reproducibility in presented material. Neoadjuvant therapy with docetaxel and degarelix can improve the treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients at high and very high risk of disease progression. The data on changes in the prostate tissue can be helpful in predicting the duration of the effect after chemohormonal therapy with subsequent surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 89
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Aspirin improves outcome in high risk prostate cancer patients treated with radiation therapy
    Jacobs, Corbin D.
    Chun, Stephen G.
    Yan, Jingsheng
    Xie, Xian-Jin
    Pistenmaa, David A.
    Hannan, Raquibul
    Lotan, Yair
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Choe, Kevin S.
    Kim, D. W. Nathan
    [J]. CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2014, 15 (06) : 699 - 706
  • [32] Neoadjuvant Exercise Therapy in Prostate Cancer
    Jones, Lee W.
    Moskowitz, Chaya S.
    Lee, Catherine P.
    Fickera, Gina A.
    Chun, Su S.
    Michalski, Meghan G.
    Stoeckel, Kurtis
    Underwood, Whitney P.
    Lavery, Jessica A.
    Bhanot, Umeshkumar
    Linkov, Irina
    Dang, Chau T.
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Laudone, Vincent P.
    Eastham, James A.
    Collins, Anne
    Sheerin, Patricia T.
    Liu, Lydia Y.
    Eng, Stefan E.
    Boutros, Paul C.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (09) : 1187 - 1194
  • [33] Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Morphologic Features and Predictive Parameters of Therapy Response
    Wang, Xueli
    Zhang, Jing
    Han, Bo
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2022, 29 (04) : 252 - 258
  • [34] Multimodal treatment strategies combining neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy with radical prostatectomy in high-risk localised prostate cancer
    Eastham, JA
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2004, 13 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [35] Differential response to neoadjuvant hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: Predictive morphological parameters and molecular markers
    Wang, Xueli
    Qi, Mei
    Zhang, Jing
    Sun, Xiubin
    Guo, Hongwei
    Pang, Yu
    Zhang, Qian
    Chen, Xinyi
    Zhang, Ruifeng
    Liu, Zhiyan
    Liu, Long
    Hao, Xiaomeng
    Han, Bo
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (07) : 709 - 719
  • [36] Predicting Pathologic Response of Esophageal Cancer to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: The Implications of Metabolic Nodal Response for Personalized Therapy
    Findlay, John M.
    Bradley, Kevin M.
    Wang, Lai Mun
    Franklin, James M.
    Teoh, Eugene J.
    Gleeson, Fergus V.
    Maynard, Nicholas D.
    Gillies, Richard S.
    Middleton, Mark R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (02) : 266 - 275
  • [37] Can Clinical Response Predict Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer?
    Khaitan, Puja G.
    Holliday, Tyler
    Carroll, Austin
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Bayley, Erin M.
    Zhou, Nicolas
    Desale, Sameer
    Watson, Thomas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (07) : 1345 - 1351
  • [38] Pathologic Response Rates after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Sarcoma: A Single Institution Study
    Seldon, Crystal
    Shrivastava, Gautam
    Fernandez, Melanie
    Jarboe, John
    Conway, Sheila
    Pretell, Juan
    Freedman, Laura
    Wolfson, Aaron
    Zhao, Wei
    Kwon, Deukwoo
    Rosenberg, Andrew
    Subhawong, Ty
    Trent, Jonathan
    Yechieli, Raphael
    [J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 11
  • [39] Predicting Factors for a Favorable Pathologic Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
    Wiesel, Ory
    Zlotnik, Oran
    Morgenstern, Sarah
    Tsur, Maya
    Menasherov, Nikolai
    Feferman, Yael
    Ben-Aharon, Irit
    Kashtan, Hanoch
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 45 (12): : 514 - 518
  • [40] Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer
    Nakabayashi M.
    Oh W.K.
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 2004, 5 (5) : 349 - 355