A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Landsat-5 TM Spectral Data for Biomass Estimation

被引:72
作者
Lopez-Serrano, Pablito M. [1 ]
Lopez-Sanchez, Carlos A. [2 ]
Alvarez-Gonzalez, Juan G. [3 ]
Garcia-Gutierrez, Jorge [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Ciencias Agr & Forestales, Negrete 800, Durango 34000, Dgo, Mexico
[2] Univ Juarez Estado Durango, Inst Silvicultura & Ind Madera, Negrete 800, Durango 34000, Dgo, Mexico
[3] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Dept Ingn Agroforestal, Ave Dr Angel Echeverri S-N,Campus Vida, Santiago De Compostela 15782 C, Spain
[4] Univ Seville, Dept Lenguajes & Sistemas Informat, Reina Mercedes S-N, E-41012 Seville, Spain
关键词
FOREST ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; FEATURE-SELECTION; VEGETATION INDEXES; CLASSIFICATION; CARBON; PREDICTION; IMAGERY; TESTS; TREE; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1080/07038992.2016.1217485
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Machine learning combines inductive and automated techniques for recognizing patterns. These techniques can be used with remote sensing datasets to map aboveground biomass (AGB) with an acceptable degree of accuracy for evaluation and management of forest ecosystems. Unfortunately, statistically rigorous comparisons of machine learning algorithms are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the 3 most common nonparametric machine learning techniques reported in the literature, vis., Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN) and Random Forest (RF), with that of the parametric multiple linear regression (MLR) for estimating AGB from Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) spectral reflectance data, texture features derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and topographical features derived from a digital elevation model (DEM). The results obtained for 99 permanent sites (for calibration/validation of the models) established during the winter of 2011 by systematic sampling in the state of Durango (Mexico), showed that SVM performed best once the parameterization had been optimized. Otherwise, SVM could be outperformed by RF. However, the kNN yielded the best overall results in relation to the goodness-of-fit measures. The findings confirm that nonparametric machine learning algorithms are powerful tools for estimating AGB with datasets derived from sensors with medium spatial resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 705
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas [J].
Abedi, Maysam ;
Norouzi, Gholam-Hossain ;
Bahroudi, Abbas .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 46 :272-283
[2]   A new Bayesian ensemble of trees approach for land cover classification of satellite imagery [J].
Agarwal, Reshu ;
Ranjan, Pritam ;
Chipman, Hugh .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 39 (06) :507-520
[3]   Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Biomass and Soil Moisture Retrievals from Remote Sensing Data [J].
Ali, Iftikhar ;
Greifeneder, Felix ;
Stamenkovic, Jelena ;
Neumann, Maxim ;
Notarnicola, Claudia .
REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 7 (12) :16398-16421
[4]   Using multilevel remote sensing and ground data to estimate forest biomass resources in remote regions: a case study in the boreal forests of interior Alaska [J].
Andersen, Hans-Erik ;
Strunk, Jacob ;
Temesgen, Hailemariam ;
Atwood, Donald ;
Winterberger, Ken .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 37 (06) :596-611
[5]   Estimating the spatial distribution of woody biomass suitable for charcoal making from remote sensing and geostatistics in central Mexico [J].
Angel Castillo-Santiago, Miguel ;
Ghilardi, Adrian ;
Oyama, Ken ;
Luis Hernandez-Stefanoni, Jose ;
Torres, Ignacio ;
Flamenco-Sandoval, Alejandro ;
Fernandez, Ana ;
Mas, Jean-Francois .
ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 17 (02) :177-188
[6]  
[Anonymous], ERD IM
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Guia para el establecimiento de sitios de investigacion forestal y de suelos en bosques del estado de Durango
[9]  
[Anonymous], BIOMASS BIOMASS MONI
[10]  
[Anonymous], CROP J IN PRESS