Gaussian Process Regression for Forest Attribute Estimation From Airborne Laser Scanning Data

被引:13
|
作者
Varvia, Petri [1 ,2 ]
Lahivaara, Timo [1 ]
Maltamo, Matti [3 ]
Packalen, Petteri [3 ]
Seppanen, Aku [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Dept Appl Phys, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Technol, Math Lab, FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
[3] Univ Eastern Finland, Sch Forest Sci, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland
来源
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Area-based approach (ABA); forest inventory; Gaussian process (GP); light detection and ranging (LiDAR); machine learning; LIDAR SAMPLE SURVEY; STAND CHARACTERISTICS; HEDMARK COUNTY; INVENTORY; BIOMASS; PREDICTION; METRICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2018.2883495
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
While the analysis of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data often provides reliable estimates for certain forest stand attributes-such as total volume or basal area-there is still room for improvement, especially in estimating species-specific attributes. Moreover, while the information on the estimate uncertainty would be useful in various economic and environmental analyses on forests, a computationally feasible framework for uncertainty quantifying in ALS is still missing. In this paper, the species-specific stand attribute estimation and uncertainty quantification (UQ) is approached using Gaussian process regression (GPR), which is a nonlinear and nonparametric machine learning method. Multiple species-specific stand attributes are estimated simultaneously: tree height, stem diameter, stem number, basal area, and stem volume. The cross-validation results show that GPR yields on average an improvement of 4.6% in estimate root mean square error over a state-of-the-art k-nearest neighbors (kNNs) implementation, negligible bias and well performing UQ (credible intervals), while being computationally fast. The performance advantage over kNN and the feasibility of credible intervals persists even when smaller training sets are used.
引用
收藏
页码:3361 / 3369
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Building reconstruction from airborne laser scanning data
    Huang Xianfeng
    GEO-SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2013, 16 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [32] Surface classification from airborne laser scanning data
    Filin, S
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2004, 30 (9-10) : 1033 - 1041
  • [33] Development of models for forest variable estimation from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach at a plot level
    Sabol J.
    Procházka D.
    Patočka Z.
    Journal of Forest Science, 2016, 62 (03) : 137 - 142
  • [34] Developing an airborne laser scanning dominant height model from a countrywide scanning survey and national forest inventory data
    Nord-Larsen, Thomas
    Riis-Nielsen, Torben
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2010, 25 (03) : 262 - 272
  • [35] Validating modeled lidar waveforms in forest canopies with airborne laser scanning data
    Ni-Meister, Wenge
    Yang, Wenze
    Lee, Shihyan
    Strahler, Alan H.
    Zhao, Feng
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 204 : 229 - 243
  • [36] Estimating and mapping forest structural diversity using airborne laser scanning data
    Mura, Matteo
    McRoberts, Ronald E.
    Chirici, Gherardo
    Marchetti, Marco
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 170 : 133 - 142
  • [37] Multivariate inference for forest inventories using auxiliary airborne laser scanning data
    McRoberts, Ronald E.
    Chen, Qi
    Walters, Brian F.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 401 : 295 - 303
  • [38] Development of Forest Stand Volume Models Based on Airborne Laser Scanning Data
    Zeng W.
    Sun X.
    Wang L.
    Wang W.
    Pu Y.
    1600, Chinese Society of Forestry (57): : 31 - 38
  • [39] Forest transportation survey based on airborne laser scanning data and GIS analyses
    Sackov, Ivan
    Smrecek, Robert
    Tucek, Jan
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2014, 51 (01) : 83 - 98
  • [40] Estimation of forest resources from a country wide laser scanning survey and national forest inventory data
    Nord-Larsen, Thomas
    Schumacher, Johannes
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 119 : 148 - 157