Work-family conflict across the lifespan

被引:59
|
作者
Huffman, Ann [1 ,2 ]
Culbertson, Satoris S. [3 ]
Henning, Jaime B. [4 ]
Goh, Adrian [5 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Dept Psychol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] WA Franke Coll Business, Flagstaff, AZ USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Psychol, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Dept Psychol, Richmond, KY 40475 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
Attitudes; Age groups; Work family issues; CAREER; JOB; IMPACT; PATTERNS; SUPPORT; MODEL; CONSERVATION; SATISFACTION; INVOLVEMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0220
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Purpose - Research on work-family conflict has primarily focused on younger workers, with little attention being paid to workers across the lifespan. To address this gap, the current study aimed to examine work-family conflict for individuals aged 18 to 70, focusing on explanations for why age is differentially related to work-family conflict at different points in one's life. Design/methodology/approach - Hypotheses were tested using data from two independent samples of working adults from the National Study of the Changing Workforce (n = 3,552 and 2,852, respectively). Findings - The results supported a curvilinear relationship, with youngest and oldest workers having the fewest conflicting demands between work and home. Further, the results demonstrated that family satisfaction and the age of the youngest child help explain why these workers are less likely to experience family interference with work. Finally, work hours were found to mediate the relationship between age and work interference with family. Originality/value - One of the most substantial demographic transformations in the general population involves the aging of the workforce. This is one of the first papers to examine and provide insight into why age is related to work-family conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 780
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Teacher stress and work-family conflict: examining a moderation model of psychological capital
    Toprak, Mustafa
    Tosten, Rasim
    Elcicek, Zakir
    IRISH EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2022,
  • [32] Perceived Organizational Support, Coworkers' Conflict and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediation Role of Work-Family Conflict
    Andrade, Claudia
    Neves, Paula C.
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [33] When Work-Family Conflict Hits Home: Parental Work-Family Conflict and Child Health
    Ohu, Eugene Agboifo
    Spitzmueller, Christiane
    Zhang, Jing
    Thomas, Candice L.
    Osezua, Anne
    Yu, Jia
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 24 (05) : 590 - 601
  • [34] Attributed causes for work-family conflict: Emotional and behavioral outcomes
    Ilies, Remus
    De Pater, Irene E.
    Lim, Sandy
    Binnewies, Carmen
    ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 2 (04) : 293 - 310
  • [35] Work-Family Conflict in professionals in the hospital environment: analysis of predictors
    De Andrade, Alexsandro Luiz
    Moraes, Thiago Drumond
    Silva, Priscilla Martins
    De Queiroz, Savio Silveira
    REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA PUCP, 2020, 38 (02): : 451 - 478
  • [36] Work-family conflict among female employees in Israeli hospitals
    Cohen, Aaron
    Liani, Efrat
    PERSONNEL REVIEW, 2009, 38 (1-2) : 124 - 141
  • [37] WORK-FAMILY CONFLICT: COPING STRATEGIES ADOPTED BY SOCIAL WORKERS
    Kalliath, Parveen
    Kalliath, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2014, 28 (01) : 111 - 126
  • [38] Anticipated work-family conflict: A construct investigation
    Westring, Alyssa Friede
    Ryan, Ann Marie
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2011, 79 (02) : 596 - 610
  • [39] Work, family and personality: A study of work-family conflict
    Blanch, Angel
    Aluja, Anton
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2009, 46 (04) : 520 - 524
  • [40] Seekingbalance: work-family conflict on Brazilian academicperiodics
    de Mello E Souza, Ana Carolina Martini Braz
    Quelha de Sa, Renata Guimaraes
    da Costa Lemos, Ana Heloisa
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2019, 10 (03): : 89 - 113