DNA methylation status is more reliable than gene expression at detecting cancer in prostate biopsy

被引:62
|
作者
Paziewska, A. [1 ]
Dabrowska, M. [2 ,3 ]
Goryca, K. [2 ,3 ]
Antoniewicz, A. [4 ]
Dobruch, J. [5 ]
Mikula, M. [2 ,3 ]
Jarosz, D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zapala, L. [4 ]
Borowka, A. [5 ]
Ostrowski, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, PL-01813 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Maria Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Genet, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Inst Oncol, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[4] Multidisciplinary Hosp Warsaw Miedzylesie, Dept Urol, PL-04749 Warsaw, Poland
[5] Med Ctr Postgrad Educ, Dept Urol, PL-01813 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
prostate cancer; biomarker; 450K Infinium Methylation BeadChip; DNA methylation; gene expression; PCR; BIOMARKERS; DIAGNOSIS; HYPERMETHYLATION; DISCOVERY; PROTOCOL; MARKERS; SEXTANT; CORES;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2014.337
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: We analysed critically the potential usefulness of RNA-and DNA-based biomarkers in supporting conventional histological diagnostic tests for prostate carcinoma (PCa) detection. Methods: Microarray profiling of gene expression and DNA methylation was performed on 16 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 32 cancerous and non-cancerous prostate samples extracted by radical prostatectomy. The predictive value of the selected biomarkers was validated by qPCR-based methods using tissue samples extracted from the 58 prostates and, separately, using 227 prostate core biopsies. Results: HOXC6, AMACR and PCA3 expression showed the best discrimination between PCa and BPH. All three genes were previously reported as the most promising mRNA-based markers for distinguishing cancerous lesions from benign prostate lesions; however, none were sufficiently sensitive and specific to meet the criteria for a PCa diagnostic biomarker. By contrast, DNA methylation levels of the APC, TACC2, RARB, DGKZ and HES5 promoter regions achieved high discriminating sensitivity and specificity, with area under the curve (AUCs) reaching 0.95 - 1.0. Only a small overlap was detected between the DNA methylation levels of PCa-positive and PCa-negative needle biopsies, with AUCs ranging between 0.854 and 0.899. Conclusions: DNA methylation-based biomarkers reflect the prostate malignancy and might be useful in supporting clinical decisions for suspected PCa following an initial negative prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 789
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of mir-203 Expression Levels and DNA Promoter Methylation Status in Serum of Patients with Endometrial Cancer
    Benati, Marco
    Montagnana, Martina
    Danese, Elisa
    Paviati, Elisa
    Giudici, Silvia
    Franchi, Massimo
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2017, 63 (10) : 1675 - 1681
  • [22] Detailed analysis of expression and promoter methylation status of apoptosis-related genes in prostate cancer
    Carvalho, Joao R.
    Filipe, Luisa
    Costa, Vera L.
    Ribeiro, Franclim Ricardo
    Martins, Ana T.
    Teixeira, Manuel R.
    Jeronimo, Carmen
    Henrique, Rui
    APOPTOSIS, 2010, 15 (08) : 956 - 965
  • [23] Comprehensive analyses of DNA methylation and gene expression profiles of Kawasaki disease
    Chang, Danqi
    Qian, Cheng
    Li, Hang
    Feng, Hong
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 120 (08) : 13001 - 13011
  • [24] A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA
    Brikun, Igor
    Nusskern, Deborah
    Decatus, Andrew
    Harvey, Eric
    Li, Lin
    Freije, Diha
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2018, 10
  • [25] Role of DNA Methylation in Cabazitaxel Resistance in Prostate Cancer
    Ramachandran, Kavitha
    Speer, Carl
    Nathanson, Lubov
    Claros, Martha
    Singal, Rakesh
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (01) : 161 - 168
  • [26] Methylation status of various gene loci in localized prostate cancer: Novel biomarkers for diagnostics and biochemical recurrence
    Eismann, Lennert
    von Walter, Philipp
    Jung, Andreas
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Rodler, Severin
    Westhofen, Thilo
    Buchner, Alexander
    Stief, Christian G.
    Stadler, Thomas
    Schlenker, Boris
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2023, 41 (07) : 325.e1 - 325.e8
  • [27] Differential Protein-Coding Gene Expression Profile in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Albarracin-Navas, Lorena
    Almonte-Becerril, Maylin
    Guerrero, Enmanuel
    Rivadeneira, Josue
    Telechea-Fernandez, Marcelino
    Guzman, Elizabeth
    Calderon, Fanny
    Hernandez-Leal, Maria Jose
    Otzen, Tamara
    Manterola, Carlos
    Duque, Galo
    Riffo-Campos, angela L.
    BIOMEDICINES, 2024, 12 (11)
  • [28] Identification of DNA methylation associated gene signatures in endometrial cancer via integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression systematically
    Men, Chuandi
    Chai, Hongjuan
    Song, Xumin
    Li, Yue
    Du, Huawen
    Ren, Qing
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (06)
  • [29] Gene expression and epigenetic discovery screen reveal methylation of SFRP2 in prostate cancer
    Perry, Antoinette S.
    O'Hurley, Gillian
    Raheem, Omer A.
    Brennan, Kevin
    Wong, Simon
    O'Grady, Anthony
    Kennedy, Anne-Marie
    Marignol, Laure
    Murphy, Therese M.
    Sullivan, Linda
    Barrett, Ciara
    Loftus, Barbara
    Thornhill, John
    Hewitt, Stephen M.
    Lawler, Mark
    Kay, Elaine
    Lynch, Thomas
    Hollywood, Donal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 132 (08) : 1771 - 1780
  • [30] DNA methylation in repeat negative prostate biopsies as a marker of missed prostate cancer
    Fiano, Valentina
    Zugna, Daniela
    Grasso, Chiara
    Trevisan, Morena
    Delsedime, Luisa
    Molinaro, Luca
    Cassoni, Paola
    Papotti, Mauro
    Merletti, Franco
    Akre, Olof
    Pettersson, Andreas
    De Marco, Laura
    Richiardi, Lorenzo
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2019, 11 (01)