Bactericidal effects of triclosan in soap both in vitro and in vivo

被引:40
作者
Kim, S. A. [1 ]
Moon, H. [1 ]
Lee, K. [1 ]
Rhee, M. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Coll Life Sci & Biotechnol, Dept Biotechnol, Seoul 136713, South Korea
关键词
HEALTH-CARE SETTINGS; ANTIBACTERIAL SOAPS; HAND HYGIENE; METHICILLIN-RESISTANT; SUSCEPTIBILITY; AGENTS; CHLORHEXIDINE; REDUCTION; GUIDELINE; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkv275
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: On December 2013, the US FDA proposed a rule stating that manufacturers must provide data to demonstrate that antibacterial soap is more effective than plain soap or water. The objective of the present study was to examine the in vitro and in vivo bactericidal effect of triclosan (the most widely used antiseptic agent in soap) in soap. Methods: Twenty bacterial strains (proposed by the FDA) were exposed to plain and antibacterial soaps (the same formulation as plain soap, but containing 0.3% triclosan) for 20 s at 22 degrees C (room temperature) and 40 degrees C (warm temperature). The temperature and time were selected to simulate the hand washing conditions and procedures used by consumers. The triclosan concentration of 0.3% is the maximum allowed by law. The decontamination efficacy of plain soap and antibacterial soap was also examined in vivo: the hands of volunteers were artificially inoculated with Serratia marcescens. Results: There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in bactericidal activity between plain soap and antibacterial soap at either test temperature. However, antibacterial soap showed significantly greater bactericidal effects after 9 h. These results suggest that although triclosan-containing soap does have antibacterial activity, the effects are not apparent during the short time required for hand washing. Conclusions: Antibacterial soap containing triclosan (0.3%) was no more effective than plain soap at reducing bacterial contamination when used under 'real-life' conditions. The present study provides practical information that may prove useful for both industry and governments.
引用
收藏
页码:3345 / 3352
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Relationship between triclosan and susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from hands in the community [J].
Aiello, AE ;
Marshall, B ;
Levy, SB ;
Della-Latta, P ;
Larson, E .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2004, 48 (08) :2973-2979
[2]   Consumer antibacterial soaps: Effective or just risky? [J].
Aiello, Allison E. ;
Larson, Elaine L. ;
Levy, Stuart B. .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 45 :S137-S147
[3]   Susceptibility of MRSA to triclosan [J].
Al-Doori, Z ;
Morrison, D ;
Edwards, G ;
Gemmell, C .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 51 (01) :185-185
[4]   An assessment of triclosan susceptibility in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Bamber, AI ;
Neal, TJ .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 41 (02) :107-109
[5]   EVALUATION OF THE SKIN DISINFECTING ACTIVITY AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHLORHEXIDINE AND TRICLOSAN HANDWASH PREPARATIONS ON HANDS ARTIFICIALLY CONTAMINATED WITH SERRATIA-MARCESCENS [J].
BARTZOKAS, CA ;
CORKILL, JE ;
MAKIN, T .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1987, 8 (04) :163-167
[6]   SURGICAL HAND DISINFECTION - COMPARISON OF 4-PERCENT CHLORHEXIDINE DETERGENT SOLUTION AND 2-PERCENT TRICLOSAN DETERGENT SOLUTION [J].
BENDIG, JWA .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1990, 15 (02) :143-148
[7]  
Bhat R., 2011, ADV BIORESEARCH, V2, P52
[8]   Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings - Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force [J].
Boyce, JM ;
Pittet, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2002, 30 (08) :S1-S46
[9]   A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity [J].
Brausch, John M. ;
Rand, Gary M. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2011, 82 (11) :1518-1532
[10]  
CDC, WASH YOUR HANDS