Mammography Quality in Turkey: Auditors' Report on a Nationwide Survey

被引:1
|
作者
Ozsoy, Arzu [1 ]
Aribal, Erkin [2 ]
Araz, Levent [1 ]
Erdogdu, Merter Bora [3 ]
Sari, Aydin [3 ]
Sencan, Irfan [3 ]
Elmas, Nevra [4 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Minist Hlth Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Ege Univ Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Mammography; Screening; Turkey; IMAGE QUALITY;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.32936
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the mammography image and reporting quality in Turkey. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty five units which provide mammography examination services were included in the audit. Samples of mammographic examinations conducted between July 1st and December 31st, 2012 were evaluated. Auditors completed web-based evaluation forms, including quality parameters and descriptive statistics on the patients and institutions. Results: Nine hundred eighty eight mammography examinations were evaluated; 47.34% of them used mammography machines less than 5 years old. Most of the older machines (10 years old or more) were grouped in private hospitals (22.1%) and university hospitals (21%). Mammographic image quality evaluation showed 56.1% non-compliance with the standard parameters. Private institutions showed the highest failure rates (P < 0.001), and low-quality images mostly (42.2%) resulted from mistakes in positioning. In 32% of the mammography reports, some mandatory information was incomplete. The reports were deemed inadequate in 59.2% of the cases. Conclusion: The audit showed significant deficiencies in terms of quality. We suggest investing more time and effort to train both radiologists and radiologic technicians to implement image and report quality standards in their units. Moreover, our study emphasized the importance of the accreditation of the units.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mammography Datasets for Neural Networks-Survey
    Mracko, Adam
    Vanovcanova, Lucia
    Cimrak, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING, 2023, 9 (05)
  • [42] Historical trends in image quality and mean glandular dose in digital mammography
    Mackenzie, Alistair
    Khan, Riyad
    Young, Kenneth C.
    15TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON BREAST IMAGING (IWBI2020), 2020, 11513
  • [43] TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE IN MAMMOGRAPHY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM SERBIA
    Zivkovic, Monika M.
    Stantic, Tomislav J.
    Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera F.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2010, 25 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [44] Quality of life valuations of mammography screening
    Amy E. Bonomi
    Denise M. Boudreau
    Paul A. Fishman
    Evette Ludman
    Amy Mohelnitzky
    Elizabeth A. Cannon
    Deb Seger
    Quality of Life Research, 2008, 17 : 801 - 814
  • [45] Recommendations for a mammography quality assurance program
    Craig A.R.
    Heggie J.C.P.
    McLean I.D.
    Coakley K.S.
    Nicoll J.J.
    Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2001, 24 (3): : 107 - 131
  • [46] Danish Quality Database for Mammography Screening
    Mikkelsen, Ellen M.
    Njor, Sisse H.
    Vejborg, Ilse
    CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 8 : 661 - 666
  • [47] Digital mammography - Quality Control and guidelines
    Heid, Patrice
    IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME, 2006, 16 (03) : 175 - 180
  • [48] Physical measures of image quality in mammography
    Chakraborty, DP
    PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING: MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2708 : 179 - 193
  • [49] Quality of life valuations of mammography screening
    Bonomi, Amy E.
    Boudreau, Denise M.
    Fishman, Paul A.
    Ludman, Evette
    Mohelnitzky, Amy
    Cannon, Elizabeth A.
    Seger, Deb
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (05) : 801 - 814
  • [50] Implementation of a Clinical Quality Control Program in a Mammography Screening Service of Brazil
    Prioli De Souza Sabino, Silvia Maria
    Silva, Thiago Buosi
    Uema Watanabe, Anapaula Hidemi
    Syrjanen, Kari
    Carvalho, Andre Lopes
    Mauad, Edmundo Carvalho
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (09) : 5057 - 5065