Mammography Quality in Turkey: Auditors' Report on a Nationwide Survey

被引:1
|
作者
Ozsoy, Arzu [1 ]
Aribal, Erkin [2 ]
Araz, Levent [1 ]
Erdogdu, Merter Bora [3 ]
Sari, Aydin [3 ]
Sencan, Irfan [3 ]
Elmas, Nevra [4 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Radiol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Minist Hlth Turkey, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Ege Univ Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Mammography; Screening; Turkey; IMAGE QUALITY;
D O I
10.5812/iranjradiol.32936
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the mammography image and reporting quality in Turkey. Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty five units which provide mammography examination services were included in the audit. Samples of mammographic examinations conducted between July 1st and December 31st, 2012 were evaluated. Auditors completed web-based evaluation forms, including quality parameters and descriptive statistics on the patients and institutions. Results: Nine hundred eighty eight mammography examinations were evaluated; 47.34% of them used mammography machines less than 5 years old. Most of the older machines (10 years old or more) were grouped in private hospitals (22.1%) and university hospitals (21%). Mammographic image quality evaluation showed 56.1% non-compliance with the standard parameters. Private institutions showed the highest failure rates (P < 0.001), and low-quality images mostly (42.2%) resulted from mistakes in positioning. In 32% of the mammography reports, some mandatory information was incomplete. The reports were deemed inadequate in 59.2% of the cases. Conclusion: The audit showed significant deficiencies in terms of quality. We suggest investing more time and effort to train both radiologists and radiologic technicians to implement image and report quality standards in their units. Moreover, our study emphasized the importance of the accreditation of the units.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Survey of Mass Detection Based on Mammography
    Wang J.-Q.
    Xu Y.
    Sun L.-L.
    Pu Z.-H.
    Zidonghua Xuebao/Acta Automatica Sinica, 2021, 47 (04): : 747 - 764
  • [32] MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS
    DODD, GD
    CANCER, 1994, 74 (01) : 239 - 243
  • [33] The impact of the mammography quality standards act on the availability of mammography facilities
    Fischer, R
    Houn, F
    Van De Griek, A
    Tucker, SA
    Meyers, D
    Murphy, M
    Unis, G
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 27 (05) : 697 - 701
  • [34] Reporting and Perceptions of Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammography: A Survey of ACR Radiologists
    Brown, Ann L.
    Wahab, Rifat A.
    Zhang, Bin
    Smetherman, Dana H.
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 : S192 - S198
  • [35] Beyond the Mammography Quality Standards Act: Measuring the Quality of Breast Cancer Screening Programs
    Rauscher, Garth H.
    Murphy, Anne Marie
    Orsi, Jennifer M.
    Dupuy, Danielle M.
    Grabler, Paula M.
    Weldon, Christine B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 202 (01) : 145 - 151
  • [36] Dose and quality of the image in mammography in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil
    Tavares, Nogueira M. S.
    Peixoto, J. E.
    Oliveira, M.
    Andrade, M. C.
    Joana, G. S.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL 25, PT 2 - DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING, 2009, 25 : 719 - 721
  • [37] Automated image quality assessment of mammography phantoms: a systematic review
    Alawaji, Zeyad
    Tavakoli Taba, Seyedamir
    Rae, William
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (03) : 971 - 986
  • [38] Exploratory survey of initial image quality in new digital mammography units prior to use in patients in Mexico
    Gaona, E.
    Rivera, T.
    Molina-Frechero, N.
    Franco, J. G.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2018, 141 : 266 - 269
  • [39] Clinical management, psychosocial characteristics, and quality of life in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia undergoing LDL-apheresis in Turkey: Results of a nationwide survey (A-HIT1 registry)
    Kayikcioglu, Meral
    Kuman-Tuncel, Ozlem
    Pirildar, Sebnem
    Yilmaz, Mehmet
    Kaynar, Leylagul
    Aktan, Melih
    Durms, Rana Berru
    Gokce, Cumali
    Temizhan, Ahmet
    Ozcebe, Osman Ilhami
    Akyol, Tulay Karaagac
    Okutan, Harika
    Sag, Saim
    Gul, Ozen Oz
    Salcioglu, Zafer
    Yenercag, Mustafa
    Altunkeser, Bulet Behlul
    Kuku, Irfan
    Yasar, Hamiyet Yilmaz
    Kurtoglu, Erdal
    Demir, Melis
    Demircioglu, Sinan
    Pekkolay, Zafer
    Ilhan, Osman
    Tokgozoglu, Lale
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LIPIDOLOGY, 2019, 13 (03) : 455 - 467
  • [40] A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography
    Kruger, RL
    Schueler, BA
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (07) : 1449 - 1454