Cardiovascular magnetic resonance can be undertaken in pregnancy and guide clinical decision-making in this patient population

被引:16
|
作者
Herrey, Anna S. [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Ane M. [3 ]
Hughes, Marina [4 ]
Ntusi, Ntobeko A. B. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Heart Ctr, London EC1A 7BE, England
[2] Royal Free London NHS Fdn Trust, Royal Free Hosp, London NW3 2QG, England
[3] John Radcliffe Hosp, Oxford Ctr Clin Magnet Resonance Res, Radcliffe Dept Med, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[4] Great Ormond St Hosp Sick Children, Cardioresp Unit, Great Ormond St, London WC1N 3JH, England
[5] Univ Cape Town, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Main Rd, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Groote Schuur Hosp, Main Rd, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[7] Univ Cape Town, Fac Hlth Sci, Hatter Inst, 4th Floor Chris Barnard Bldg,Private Bag X3, ZA-7935 Cape Town, South Africa
[8] Univ Cape Town, Cape Univ Body Imaging Ctr, J Block Groote Schuur Hosp, UCT MRI Unit 10, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
cardiovascular magnetic resonance; pregnancy; cardiovascular disease; gadolinium; heart failure; PERIPARTUM CARDIOMYOPATHY; DISEASE; WOMEN; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; AFRICA; SAFETY; FETAL;
D O I
10.1093/ehjci/jey162
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, frequently requiring cardiac imaging for diagnosis, and follow-up. This need does not change pregnancy; however, many centres do not offer cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to pregnant patients. This paper explores current practice of CMR in pregnancy in four large volume centres, its safety and its impact on patient management. Methods and results Between 2008 and 2017, we collected consecutive pregnant patients between four centres. Guidelines and local standard operating procedures were followed and outcomes recorded modelled on the EuroCMR registry. Eighty-three women had diagnostic CMR without immediate complications. The commonest indication was vascular or congenital disease (48%), followed by cardiomyopathy/myocarditis (43%). Nineteen percent received contrast, and CMR changed management in 35% and in 50% of patients who received contrast. Conclusion In this largest cohort to date describing CMR in pregnancy, we found that results frequently change management, thus adding valuable guidance for patient care. We conclude that CMR should be offered to pregnant women when indicated, including the administration of contrast as per current guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 297
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predictive Modeling of Physician-Patient Dynamics That Influence Sleep Medication Prescriptions and Clinical Decision-Making
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Kartoun, Uri
    Pai, Jennifer K.
    Chatterjee, Arnaub K.
    Fitzgerald, Timothy P.
    Shaw, Stanley Y.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [42] A randomised controlled trial evaluating the utility of a patient Decision Aid to improve clinical trial (RAVES 08.03) related decision-making
    Sundaresan, Puma
    Ager, Brittany
    Turner, Sandra
    Costa, Dan
    Kneebone, Andrew
    Pearse, Maria
    Woo, Henry
    Tesson, Stephanie
    Juraskova, Ilona
    Butow, Phyllis
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (01) : 124 - 129
  • [43] Stress cardiac magnetic resonance for mortality prediction and decision-making: registry of 2496 elderly patients with chronic coronary syndrome
    Gabaldon-Perez, Ana
    Bonanad, Clara
    Garcia-Blas, Sergio
    Gavara, Jose
    Rios-Navarro, Cesar
    Perez-Sole, Nerea
    de Dios, Elena
    Marcos-Garces, Victor
    Merenciano-Gonzalez, Hector
    Monmeneu, Jose, V
    Lopez-Lereu, Maria P.
    Nunez, Julio
    Chorro, Francisco J.
    Bodi, Vicente
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2022, 75 (03): : 223 - 231
  • [44] Magnetic resonance imaging for acute appendicitis in pregnancy: can clinical scores predict when imaging is needed?
    Kahana, Noam
    Boaz, Elad
    Neymark, Mariya
    Gilshtein, Hayim
    Dror, Yossi Freier
    Benjaminov, Ofer
    Reissman, Petachia
    Tankel, James
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2024, 50 (06) : 3273 - 3279
  • [45] Cognitive bias during clinical decision-making and its influence on patient outcomes in the emergency department: A scoping review
    Jala, Sheila
    Fry, Margaret
    Elliott, Rosalind
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (19-20) : 7076 - 7085
  • [46] Clinical experience of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacing devices: unrestricted patient population
    Vuorinen, Aino-Maija
    Pakarinen, Sami
    Jaakkola, Ilkka
    Holmstrom, Miia
    Kivisto, Sari
    Kaasalainen, Touko
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2019, 60 (11) : 1414 - 1421
  • [47] Decision-making in complex clinical scenarios using an ethical framework: Kidney transplantation in a patient with severe left ventricular dysfunction
    Parameswaran, Sreejith
    Lata, Suman
    Satheesh, Santhosh
    Ramanitharan, Manikandan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 13 (03) : 221 - 224
  • [48] Self-rated physical fitness predicts cardiovascular and all-cause mortality-implications for clinical decision-making
    Moissl, Angela P.
    Delgado, Graciela E.
    Kleber, Marcus E.
    Mooren, Frank C.
    Schaefer, Hendrik
    Kraemer, Bernhard K.
    Maerz, Winfried
    Schmitz, Boris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [49] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Distinct Shared Decision-Making Aids for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis in an Ethnically Diverse Patient Population
    Shue, Jennifer
    Karia, Raj J.
    Cardone, Dennis
    Samuels, Jonathan
    Shah, Mehul
    Slover, James D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (04) : 487 - 493
  • [50] Patient-Specific Computational Modeling of Upper Extremity Arteriovenous Fistula Creation: Its Feasibility to Support Clinical Decision-Making
    Bode, Aron S.
    Huberts, Wouter
    Bosboom, E. Marielle H.
    Kroon, Wilco
    van der Linden, Wim P. M.
    Planken, R. Nils
    van de Vosse, Frans N.
    Tordoir, Jan H. M.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):