p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Cytology for Detection of Cervical Precancer in HPV-Positive Women

被引:142
|
作者
Wentzensen, Nicolas [1 ]
Fetterman, Barbara [2 ]
Castle, Philip E. [3 ,4 ]
Schiffman, Mark [1 ]
Wood, Shannon N. [1 ]
Stiemerling, Eric [2 ]
Tokugawa, Diane [2 ]
Bodelon, Clara [1 ]
Poitras, Nancy [2 ]
Lorey, Thomas [2 ]
Kinney, Walter [5 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, TPMG Reg Lab, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Global Coalit Cerv Canc, Arlington, VA USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[5] Kaiser Permanente Med Care Program, Div Gynecol Oncol, Oakland, CA USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2015年 / 107卷 / 12期
关键词
HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS DNA; CANCER PRECURSORS; INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; PREDICTIVE VALUES; SCREENING-TESTS; FOLLOW-UP; PERFORMANCE; PREVENTION; COLPOSCOPY; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv257
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening requires triage markers to decide who should be referred to colposcopy. p16/Ki-67 dual stain cytology has been proposed as a biomarker for cervical precancers. We evaluated the dual stain in a large population of HPV-positive women. Methods: One thousand five hundred and nine HPV-positive women screened with HPV/cytology cotesting at Kaiser Permanente California were enrolled into a prospective observational study in 2012. Dual stain cytology was performed on residual Surepath material, and slides were evaluated for dual stain-positive cells. Disease endpoints were ascertained from the clinical database at KPNC. We evaluated the clinical performance of the assay among all HPV-positive women and among HPV-positive, cytology-negative women. We used internal benchmarks for clinical management to evaluate the clinical relevance of the dual stain assay. We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the dual stain compared with Pap cytology. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: The dual stain had lower positivity (45.9%) compared with cytology at an ASC-US threshold (53.4%). For detection of CIN2+, the dual stain had similar sensitivity (83.4% vs 76.6%, P = .1), and statistically higher specificity (58.9% vs 49.6%, P < .001), PPV (21.0% vs 16.6%, P < .001), and NPV (96.4% vs 94.2%, P = .01) compared with cytology. Similar patterns were observed for CIN3+. Women with a positive test had high enough risk for referral to colposcopy, while the risk for women with negative tests was below a one-year return threshold based on current US management guidelines. Conclusion: Dual stain cytology showed good risk stratification for all HPV-positive women and for HPV-positive women with normal cytology. Additional follow-up is needed to determine how long dual stain negative women remain at low risk of precancer.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Enhancing Cervical Cancer Screening: Review of p16/Ki-67 Dual Staining as a Promising Triage Strategy
    Ouh, Yung-Taek
    Kim, Ho Yeon
    Yi, Kyong Wook
    Lee, Nak-Woo
    Kim, Hai-Joong
    Min, Kyung-Jin
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (04)
  • [42] Prospective evaluation of p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology for managing women with abnormal Papanicolaou cytology: PALMS study results
    Bergeron, Christine
    Ikenberg, Hans
    Sideri, Mario
    Denton, Karin
    Bogers, Johannes
    Schmidt, Dietmar
    Alameda, Francisco
    Keller, Thomas
    Rehm, Susanne
    Ridder, Ruediger
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 123 (06) : 373 - 381
  • [43] Novel concepts in cervical cancer screening: a comparison of VIA, HPV DNA test and p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual stain cytology in Western Kenya
    Orang'o, Elkanah Omenge
    Were, Edwin
    Rode, Oliver
    Muthoka, Kapten
    Byczkowski, Michael
    Sartor, Heike
    Vanden Broeck, Davy
    Schmidt, Dietmar
    Reuschenbach, Miriam
    von Knebel Doeberitz, Magnus
    Bussmann, Hermann
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [44] The p16/ki-67 assay is a safe, effective and rapid approach to triage women with mild cervical lesions
    Magkana, Maria
    Mentzelopoulou, Panagiota
    Magkana, Ekaterini
    Pampanos, Andreas
    Daskalakis, Georgios
    Domali, Ekaterini
    Rodolakis, Alexandros
    Pappa, Kalliopi
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [45] p16/Ki-67 dual stain, PAP cytology and HR-HPV test results prior to and 6 months after a LLETZ procedure: a prospective observational cohort study
    Packet, Bram
    Poppe, Willy
    Vanherck, Miet
    Weynand, Birgit
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2023, 307 (02) : 519 - 524
  • [46] Expression of p16/Ki-67 in ASC-US/LSIL or Normal Cytology with Presence of Oncogenic HPV DNA
    Solares, Concepcion
    Velasco, Julio
    Alvarez-Ruiz, Eduardo
    Gonzalez-Fernandez, Laura
    Encinas, Ana-Isabel
    Astudillo, Aurora
    Schneider, Jose
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (11) : 6291 - 6295
  • [47] Clinical Evaluation of Human Papillomavirus Screening With p16/Ki-67 Dual Stain Triage in a Large Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Program
    Wentzensen, Nicolas
    Clarke, Megan A.
    Bremer, Renee
    Poitras, Nancy
    Tokugawa, Diane
    Goldhoff, Patricia E.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Schiffman, Mark
    Kingery, Julie D.
    Grewal, Kiranjit K.
    Locke, Alex
    Kinney, Walter
    Lorey, Thomas S.
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 881 - 888
  • [48] Good performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-stain cytology for detection and post-treatment surveillance of high-gradeCIN/VAINin a prospective, cross-sectional study
    Liu, Wei
    Gong, Jinping
    Xu, Haicang
    Zhang, Dan
    Xia, Nannan
    Li, Hongxuan
    Song, Kejuan
    Lv, Teng
    Chen, Yulong
    Diao, Yuchao
    Jao, Jinwen
    Dai, Shuzhen
    Zhao, Peng
    Yao, Qin
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 48 (07) : 635 - 644
  • [49] A positive HPV test with positive p16/Ki-67 double staining in self-sampled vaginal material is an accurate tool to detect women at risk for cervical cancer
    Lorenzi, Noely P. C.
    Termini, Lara
    Ferreira-Filho, Edson S.
    Nunes, Rafaella A. L.
    Silva, Gabriela A. F.
    Lepique, Ana P.
    Longatto-Filho, Adhemar
    Tacla, Maricy
    Baracat, Edmund C.
    Villa, Luisa L.
    Soares-Junior, Jose M.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 130 (01) : 41 - 54
  • [50] Should we use risk selection tests for HPV 16 and/or 18 positive cases: Comparison of p16/Ki67 and cytology
    Mazurec, Karolina
    Trzeszcz, Martyna
    Mazurec, Maciej
    Streb, Joanna
    Halon, Agnieszka
    Jach, Robert
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 96 (03)