Life Cycle-based Assessment of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Almond Production, Part II: Uncertainty Analysis through Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Testing

被引:20
作者
Marvinney, Elias [1 ]
Kendall, Alissa [2 ]
Brodt, Sonja [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Agr Resources & Environm, Agr Sustainabil Inst, Davis, CA 95618 USA
关键词
field nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions; food production; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; irrigation; life cycle assessment (LCA); temporary carbon storage; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; TEMPORARY-STORAGE; BIOGENIC CARBON; CO2; EMISSIONS; BLACK CARBON; BIOMASS; LCA; BIOENERGY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This is the second part of a two-article series examining California almond production. The part I article describes development of the analytical framework and life cycle-based model and presents typical energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for California almonds. This part II article builds on this by exploring uncertainty in the life cycle model through sensitivity and scenario analysis, and by examining temporary carbon storage in the orchard. Sensitivity analysis shows life cycle GHG emissions are most affected by biomass fate and utilization, followed by nitrous oxide emissions rates from orchard soils. Model sensitivity for net energy consumption is highest for irrigation system parameters, followed by biomass fate and utilization. Scenario analysis shows utilization of orchard biomass for electricity production has the greatest potential effect, assuming displacement methods are used for co-product allocation. Results of the scenario analysis show that 1 kilogram (kg) of almond kernel and associated co-products are estimated to cause between -3.12 to 2.67 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq) emissions and consume between 27.6 to 52.5 megajoules (MJ) of energy. Co-product displacement credits lead to avoided emissions of between -1.33 to 2.45 kg CO2-eq and between -0.08 to 13.7 MJ of avoided energy use, leading to net results of -1.39 to 3.99kg CO2-eq and 15.3 to 52.6MJ per kg kernel (net results are calculated by subtracting co-product credits from the results for almonds and co-products). Temporary carbon storage in orchard biomass and soils is accounted for by using alternative global warming characterization factors and leads to a 14% to 18% reduction in CO2-eq emissions. Future studies of orchards and other perennial cropping systems should likely consider temporary carbon storage.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1029
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Evaluation of strategies for utilizing rice husk based on life cycle cost analysis in relation to Greenhouse Gas emissions in An Giang province, Vietnam [J].
Pham Thi Mai Thao ;
Kurisu, Kiyo H. ;
Hanaki, Keisuke .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 37 :122-131
[32]   Life-cycle assessment of two sewage sludge-to-energy systems based on different sewage sludge characteristics: Energy balance and greenhouse gas-emission footprint analysis [J].
Chen, Renjie ;
Yuan, Shijie ;
Chen, Sisi ;
Ci, Hanlin ;
Dai, Xiaohu ;
Wang, Xiankai ;
Li, Chong ;
Wang, Dianchang ;
Dong, Bin .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2022, 111 :380-391
[33]   Prioritizing regionalization efforts in life cycle assessment through global sensitivity analysis: a sector meta-analysis based on ecoinvent v3 [J].
Patouillard, Laure ;
Collet, Pierre ;
Lesage, Pascal ;
Seco, Pablo Tirado ;
Bulle, Cecile ;
Margni, Manuele .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (12) :2238-2254
[34]   How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues [J].
Roeder, Mirjam ;
Whittaker, Carly ;
Thornley, Patricia .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2015, 79 :50-63
[35]   Estimating impacts of alternate wetting and drying on greenhouse gas emissions from early wet rice production in a full-dike system in An Giang Province, Vietnam, through life cycle assessment [J].
Leon, Ai ;
Minamikawa, Kazunori ;
Izumi, Taro ;
Chiem, Nguyen Huu .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 285
[36]   Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from indirect land-use change in biofuels production: concepts and exploratory analysis for soybean-based biodiesel [J].
Panichelli, Luis ;
Gnansounou, Edgard .
JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, 2008, 67 (11) :1017-1030
[37]   Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of HFC-134a production from natural gas compared with oil-based and coal-based production [J].
Zhang, Suisui ;
Li, Gang ;
Bai, Boyang ;
Qiang, Luyao ;
Ma, Xiaoxun ;
Li, Jingying .
FRONTIERS OF CHEMICAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 16 (12) :1713-1725
[38]   Life Cycle Assessment of Fuel Cell Vehicles Considering the Detailed Vehicle Components: Comparison and Scenario Analysis in China Based on Different Hydrogen Production Schemes [J].
Chen, Yisong ;
Hu, Xu ;
Liu, Jiahui .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (15)
[39]   Optimal energy supply network determination and life cycle analysis for hybrid coal, biomass, and natural gas to liquid (CBGTL) plants using carbon-based hydrogen production [J].
Elia, Josephine A. ;
Baliban, Richard C. ;
Xiao, Xin ;
Floudas, Christodoulos A. .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 35 (08) :1399-1430
[40]   Use of Low/Mid-Temperature Solar Heat for Thermochemical Upgrading of Energy, Part II: A Novel Zero-Emissions Design (ZE-SOLRGT) of the Solar Chemically-Recuperated Gas-Turbine Power Generation System (SOLRGT) guided by its Exergy Analysis [J].
Zhang, Na ;
Lior, Noam ;
Luo, Chending .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2012, 134 (07)