Life Cycle-based Assessment of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Almond Production, Part II: Uncertainty Analysis through Sensitivity Analysis and Scenario Testing

被引:18
|
作者
Marvinney, Elias [1 ]
Kendall, Alissa [2 ]
Brodt, Sonja [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Plant Sci, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95618 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Agr Resources & Environm, Agr Sustainabil Inst, Davis, CA 95618 USA
关键词
field nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions; food production; greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; irrigation; life cycle assessment (LCA); temporary carbon storage; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; TEMPORARY-STORAGE; BIOGENIC CARBON; CO2; EMISSIONS; BLACK CARBON; BIOMASS; LCA; BIOENERGY; IMPACT; TIME;
D O I
10.1111/jiec.12333
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This is the second part of a two-article series examining California almond production. The part I article describes development of the analytical framework and life cycle-based model and presents typical energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for California almonds. This part II article builds on this by exploring uncertainty in the life cycle model through sensitivity and scenario analysis, and by examining temporary carbon storage in the orchard. Sensitivity analysis shows life cycle GHG emissions are most affected by biomass fate and utilization, followed by nitrous oxide emissions rates from orchard soils. Model sensitivity for net energy consumption is highest for irrigation system parameters, followed by biomass fate and utilization. Scenario analysis shows utilization of orchard biomass for electricity production has the greatest potential effect, assuming displacement methods are used for co-product allocation. Results of the scenario analysis show that 1 kilogram (kg) of almond kernel and associated co-products are estimated to cause between -3.12 to 2.67 kg carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq) emissions and consume between 27.6 to 52.5 megajoules (MJ) of energy. Co-product displacement credits lead to avoided emissions of between -1.33 to 2.45 kg CO2-eq and between -0.08 to 13.7 MJ of avoided energy use, leading to net results of -1.39 to 3.99kg CO2-eq and 15.3 to 52.6MJ per kg kernel (net results are calculated by subtracting co-product credits from the results for almonds and co-products). Temporary carbon storage in orchard biomass and soils is accounted for by using alternative global warming characterization factors and leads to a 14% to 18% reduction in CO2-eq emissions. Future studies of orchards and other perennial cropping systems should likely consider temporary carbon storage.
引用
收藏
页码:1019 / 1029
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Life Cycle-based Assessment of Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Almond Production, Part I: Analytical Framework and Baseline Results
    Kendall, Alissa
    Marvinney, Elias
    Brodt, Sonja
    Zhu, Weiyuan
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 19 (06) : 1008 - 1018
  • [2] Life cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for road transportation fuels in China
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Crookes, Roy J.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2009, 13 (09) : 2505 - 2514
  • [3] Life-cycle analysis of energy and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive fuels in India: Part 1-Tank-to-Wheel analysis
    Gupta, S.
    Patil, V.
    Himabindu, M.
    Ravikrishna, R. V.
    ENERGY, 2016, 96 : 684 - 698
  • [4] Comparing high and low residential density: Life-cycle analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
    Norman, J
    MacLean, HL
    Kennedy, CA
    JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 132 (01) : 10 - 21
  • [5] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Generation: A Comparative Analysis of Australian Energy Sources
    Hardisty, Paul E.
    Clark, Tom S.
    Hynes, Robert G.
    ENERGIES, 2012, 5 (04) : 872 - 897
  • [6] Life cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional food production systems, with and without bio-energy options
    Cooper, J. M.
    Butler, G.
    Leifert, C.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2011, 58 (3-4) : 185 - 192
  • [7] Parameter Uncertainty Analysis of the Life Cycle Inventory Database: Application to Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Brown Rice Production in IDEA
    Baek, Chun-Youl
    Tahara, Kiyotaka
    Park, Kyu-Hyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (04)
  • [8] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    Sierk de Jong
    Kay Antonissen
    Ric Hoefnagels
    Laura Lonza
    Michael Wang
    André Faaij
    Martin Junginger
    Biotechnology for Biofuels, 10
  • [9] Life-cycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable jet fuel production
    de Jong, Sierk
    Antonissen, Kay
    Hoefnagels, Ric
    Lonza, Laura
    Wang, Michael
    Faaij, Andre
    Junginger, Martin
    BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
  • [10] Development and application of an electric vehicles life-cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions analysis model
    Peng, Tianduo
    Ou, Xunmin
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2018, 131 : 699 - 708