Clinical Outcomes Following Regenerative Therapy of Non-Contained Intrabony Defects Using a Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral Combined With Either Enamel Matrix Derivative or Collagen Membrane

被引:41
作者
Iorio-Siciliano, Vincenzo [1 ]
Andreuccetti, Gianmaria [1 ]
Blasi, Andrea [1 ]
Matarasso, Marco
Sculean, Anton [2 ]
Salvi, Giovanni E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Dent & Maxillofacial Sci, Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Bern, Sch Dent Med, Dept Periodontol, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Bone substitutes; chronic periodontitis; dental enamel proteins; guided tissue regeneration; membranes; periodontal pocket; PERIODONTAL OSSEOUS DEFECTS; GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION; PAPILLA PRESERVATION FLAP; BIO-OSS COLLAGEN; HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION; BARRIER MEMBRANES; INFRABONY DEFECTS; SURGICAL APPROACH; HEALING RESPONSE; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.1902/jop.2014.130420
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes in the treatment of deep non-contained intrabony defects (i.e., with >= 70% 1-wall component and a residual 2- to 3-wall component in the most apical part) using deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) combined with either enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) or collagen membrane (CM). Methods: Forty patients with multiple intrabony defects were enrolled. Only one non-contained defect per patient with an intrabony depth >= 3 mm located in the interproximal area of single- and multirooted teeth was randomly assigned to the treatment with either EMD + DBBM (test: n = 20) or CM + DBBM (control: n = 20). At baseline and after 12 months, clinical parameters including probing depth (PD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. The primary outcome variable was the change in CAL between baseline and 12 months. Results: At baseline, the intrabony component of the defects amounted to 6.1 +/- 1.9 mm for EMD + DBBM and 6.0 +/- 1.9 mm for CM + DBBM sites (P = 0.81). The mean CAL gain at sites treated with EMD + DBBM was not statistically significantly different (P = 0.82) compared with CM + DBBM (3.8 +/- 1.5 versus 3.7 +/- 1.2 mm). No statistically significant difference (P = 0.62) was observed comparing the frequency of CAL gain >= 4 mm between EMD + DBBM (60%) and CM + DBBM (50%) or comparing the frequency of residual PD >= 6 mm between EMD + DBBM (5%) and CM + DBBM (15%) (P = 0.21). Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, regenerative therapy using either EMD + DBBM or CM + DBBM yielded comparable clinical outcomes in deep non-contained intrabony defects after 12 months.
引用
收藏
页码:1342 / 1350
页数:9
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据