Theoretical analysis of fluid inclusions for in situ soil stress and deformation measurements

被引:22
作者
Berli, Markus
Eggers, C. G.
Accorsi, M. L.
Or, Dani
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Res Stn Agroecol & Agr, FAL, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, LASEP, Sch Architectural Civil & Environm Engn, ENAC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2005.0171
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
In situ determination of stress, strength, and deformation of soils for direct assessment of trafficability and susceptibility to compaction has been a long-standing problem in soil mechanics and agricultural engineering. Despite considerable progress in development of sophisticated probes, data interpretation remains in its infancy due to incomplete understanding of soil-probe interaction. In this study we developed a novel theoretical framework for describing pressure and deformation of fluid inclusions within an elasto-plastic soil matrix subject to anisotropic remote stresses that provides the basis for development of in situ probes for stress and deformation measurement. Results showed that for a compressible fluid inclusion (e.g., air) embedded in an elastic matrix, inclusion pressure is determined primarily by the matrix mean stress, Poisson's ratio, and the product of matrix bulk modulus and fluid compressibility. For incompressible fluids (e.g., water), inclusion pressure becomes independent of matrix stiffness. Differences in remote stress affect inclusion shape and influence probe pressure for large deformation due to increasing stress concentration. The solution for an elastic matrix also provides upper and lower bounds for inclusion pressure in an elasto-plastic matrix under isotropic stress. For the more common anisotropic remote stress, inclusion pressure and deformation differ considerably for elastic and elasto-plastic soil matrix. We found that elastic rubber membranes, often used to separate the fluid inclusion from the matrix, do not influence inclusion pressure or shape as long as membrane and soil stiffness are of similar magnitude. Pressure measurements from laboratory and field experiments using the so-called Boiling probe agreed well with inclusion pressures predicted by the proposed model.
引用
收藏
页码:1441 / 1452
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J SOIL MECH FDN DIV
[2]   DEFORMABLE SPHERICAL DEVICES TO MEASURE STRESSES WITHIN FIELD SOILS [J].
BLACKWELL, PS ;
SOANE, BD .
JOURNAL OF TERRAMECHANICS, 1978, 15 (04) :207-222
[3]   Rheological properties of wet soils and clays under steady and oscillatory stresses [J].
Ghezzehei, TA ;
Or, D .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (03) :624-637
[4]  
Gibson RE., 1961, CIV ENGNG PUB WKS RE, V56, P615
[5]  
Hovanesian J.D., 1959, T ASAE, V2, P0078, DOI [10.13031/2013.41174, DOI 10.13031/2013.41174]
[6]   Interpretation of pressuremeter tests in sand using advanced soil model [J].
Hsieh, YM ;
Whittle, AJ ;
Yu, HS .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 128 (03) :274-278
[7]   NONLINEAR STIFFNESS PARAMETERS FROM UNDRAINED PRESSUREMETER TESTS [J].
JARDINE, RJ .
CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 29 (03) :436-447
[8]   Soil stress measurement: Part I. Transducer in a uniform stress field [J].
Kirby, JM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1999, 72 (02) :151-160
[9]   Soil stress measurement. Part 2: Transducer beneath a circular loaded area [J].
Kirby, JM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 1999, 73 (02) :141-149
[10]   Plastic behavior of metals in the strain-hardening range part I [J].
Nadai, A .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1937, 8 (03) :205-213