Analysts' use of dividends in earnings forecasts

被引:1
作者
Das, Somnath [1 ]
Schaberl, Philipp D. [2 ]
Sen, Pradyot K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Univ Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO USA
[3] Univ Washington Bothell, Bothell, WA USA
关键词
Analysts' forecast errors; Analyst inefficiency; Analysts' optimistic Bias; Dividends; Dividend displacement; Earnings forecasts; Median regression; Theil-Sen estimator; INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES; INFORMATION; POLICY; FUTURE; RISK; RELEVANCE; RETURNS; PROFITS; ERRORS; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1007/s11142-022-09735-8
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the association between current dividends and analysts' subsequent earnings forecast errors. This investigation is motivated by the evidence on analyst optimism and Ohlson's (1991, 1995) fundamental valuation theory that dividends displace future permanent earnings. For the sample period 1985-2016, we document that current dividends are positively correlated with analysts' future forecast errors, suggesting that analysts potentially ignore the displacement effect of dividends on future earnings. Consistent with theory, this association persists in settings with stable dividends, (i.e., where dividends have limited or no signaling implications) and varies predictably with dividend payouts and cost of capital. We also find that this empirical regularity that analysts do not fully incorporate the effect of dividends on future earnings provides opportunities for arbitrage. More interestingly, we find that the strength of the association between dividends and analysts' forecast errors has declined over the sample period; this decline appears to correspond with the underlying change in the discount rate over time. The finding that analysts' do not fully incorporate the implications of current dividends on future earnings is consistent with previously documented inefficiencies in analysts' use of publicly available information. However, such a systematic association with dividends also suggests that it may be a source of the persistence in analysts' optimistic bias and thus offers new insights into analyst behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1234
页数:43
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   TESTS OF ANALYSTS OVERREACTION UNDERREACTION TO EARNINGS INFORMATION AS AN EXPLANATION FOR ANOMALOUS STOCK-PRICE BEHAVIOR [J].
ABARBANELL, JS ;
BERNARD, VL .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1992, 47 (03) :1181-1207
[2]   DO ANALYSTS EARNINGS FORECASTS INCORPORATE INFORMATION IN PRIOR STOCK-PRICE CHANGES [J].
ABARBANELL, JS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1991, 14 (02) :147-165
[3]  
ALI A, 1992, ACCOUNT REV, V67, P183
[4]  
Allen F., 2003, Handbook of the Economics of Finance". Vol, V1, P337
[5]  
Ang JS, 2009, ROBERT W KOLB SER FI, P97
[6]   Investment opportunities and the structure of executive compensation [J].
Baber, WR ;
Janakiraman, SN ;
Kang, SH .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1996, 21 (03) :297-318
[7]  
Barth M., 1996, CONTEMP ACCOUNT RES, P527, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1911-3846.1996.TB00514.X
[8]   OPEN-MARKET STOCK REPURCHASES AS SIGNALS FOR EARNINGS AND RISK CHANGES [J].
BARTOV, E .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1991, 14 (03) :275-294
[9]  
Bebchuk L A., 2011, Staggered boards and the wealth of shareholders: Evidence from two natural experiments (No. w17127)
[10]  
Benartzi S, 1997, J FINANC, V52, P1007, DOI 10.2307/2329514