Bone structure determined by HR-MDCT does not correlate with micro-CT of lumbar vertebral biopsies: a prospective cross-sectional human in vivo study

被引:6
作者
Pumberger, Matthias [1 ]
Issever, Ahi Sema [2 ]
Diekhoff, Torsten [2 ]
Schwemmer, Christin [3 ]
Berg, Susanne [3 ]
Palmowski, Yannick [1 ]
Putzier, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Ctr Musculoskeletal Surg, Spine Dept, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiol, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Spine; Vertebral biopsies; MDCT; Micro-CT; Osteoporosis; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MDCT; TRABECULAR BONE; MINERAL DENSITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; SAGITTAL REFORMATIONS; PROXIMAL FEMUR; MU-CT; SPINE; DXA; OSTEOPOROSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-020-01895-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundOsteoporosis is characterized by a deterioration of bone structure and quantity that leads to an increased risk of fractures. The primary diagnostic tool for the assessment of the bone quality is currently the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), which however only measures bone quantity. High-resolution multidetector computed tomography (HR-MDCT) offers an alternative approach to assess bone structure, but still lacks evidence for its validity in vivo. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of HR-MDCT for the evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine.MethodsWe conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to compare the results of preoperative lumbar HR-MDCT scans with those from microcomputed tomography (mu CT) analysis of transpedicular vertebral body biopsies. For this purpose, we included patients undergoing spinal surgery in our orthopedic department. Each patient underwent preoperative HR-MDCT scanning (L1-L4). Intraoperatively, transpedicular biopsies were obtained from intact vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis of these biopsies was used as a reference method to assess the actual bone architecture. HR-MDCT results were statistically analyzed regarding the correlation with results from mu CT.ResultsThirty-four patients with a mean age of 69.09years ( 10.07) were included in the study. There was no significant correlation for any of the parameters (bone volume/total volume, trabecular separation, trabecular thickness) between mu CT and HR-MDCT (bone volume/total volume: r = - 0.026 and p = 0.872; trabecular thickness: r = 0.074 and r = 6.42; and trabecular separation: r = - 0.18 and p = 0.254).Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing in vivo HR-MDCT with mu CT analysis of vertebral biopsies in human patients. Our findings suggest that lumbar HR-MDCT is not valid for the in vivo evaluation of bone architecture in the lumbar spine. New diagnostic tools for the evaluation of osteoporosis and preoperative orthopedic planning are urgently needed.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Bone strength and its determinants [J].
Ammann, P ;
Rizzoli, R .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (Suppl 3) :S13-S18
[2]   Analysis of trabecular bone structure with multidetector spiral computed tomography in a simulated soft-tissue environment [J].
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Link, Thomas M. ;
Burghardt, Andrew ;
Henning, Tobias D. ;
Mueller, Dirk ;
Majumdar, Sharmila ;
Prevrhal, Sven .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 80 (06) :366-373
[3]  
Bauer JS, 2004, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V176, P709, DOI 10.1055/s-2004-813079
[4]   Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength? [J].
Baum, Thomas ;
Graebeldinger, Martin ;
Raeth, Christoph ;
Garcia, Eduardo Grande ;
Burgkart, Rainer ;
Patsch, Janina M. ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Link, Thomas M. ;
Bauer, Jan S. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2014, 32 (01) :56-64
[5]   Converted Lumbar BMD Values Derived from Sagittal Reformations of Contrast-Enhanced MDCT Predict Incidental Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures [J].
Baum, Thomas ;
Mueller, Dirk ;
Dobritz, Martin ;
Wolf, Petra ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Link, Thomas M. ;
Bauer, Jan S. .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 90 (06) :481-487
[6]   BMD measurements of the spine derived from sagittal reformations of contrast-enhanced MDCT without dedicated software [J].
Bauma, Thomas ;
Mueller, Dirk ;
Dobritz, Martin ;
Rummeny, Ernst J. ;
Link, Thomas M. ;
Bauer, Jan S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) :E140-E145
[7]   Micro-CT vs. Whole Body Multirow Detector CT for Analysing Bone Regeneration in an Animal Model [J].
Bissinger, Oliver ;
Kirschke, Jan S. ;
Probst, Florian Andreas ;
Stauber, Martin ;
Wolff, Klaus-Dietrich ;
Haller, Bernhard ;
Goetz, Carolin ;
Plank, Christian ;
Kolk, Andreas .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[8]   DXA in vivo BMD methodology:: An erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling [J].
Bolotin, H. H. .
BONE, 2007, 41 (01) :138-154
[9]   The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis [J].
Burke, Christopher John ;
Didolkar, Manjiri M. ;
Barnhart, Huiman X. ;
Vinson, Emily N. .
CLINICAL CASES IN MINERAL AND BONE METABOLISM, 2016, 13 (02) :135-140
[10]   AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2016 [J].
Camacho, Pauline M. ;
Petak, Steven M. ;
Binkley, Neil ;
Clarke, Bart L. ;
Harris, Steven T. ;
Hurley, Daniel L. ;
Kleerekoper, Michael ;
Lewiecki, E. Michael ;
Miller, Paul D. ;
Narula, Harmeet S. ;
Pessah-Pollack, Rachel ;
Tangpricha, Vin ;
Wimalawansa, Sunil J. ;
Watts, Nelson B. .
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE, 2016, 22 :1-42